| Revision as of 05:09, 9 March 2015 editAKS.9955 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users30,222 edits →Mansi Dovhal: Re← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:13, 9 March 2015 edit undoT Cells (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers8,996 edits →Mansi Dovhal: Response to bad faith posting by User:AKS.9955Next edit → | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 20:45, 8 March 2015 (UTC)</small> | :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 20:45, 8 March 2015 (UTC)</small> | ||
| *'''Comment''': ]: In response to what you stated above, I have left a message on your . You really need to understand the reasons better before putting any more articles for deletion since your track record on ] is very poor and 57% of your nominations failed and you have just increased work for other editors.''']]''' 05:09, 9 March 2015 (UTC) | *'''Comment''': ]: In response to what you stated above, I have left a message on your ]. You really need to understand the reasons better before putting any more articles for deletion since your track record on ] is very poor and 57% of your nominations failed and you have just increased work for other editors.''']]''' 05:09, 9 March 2015 (UTC) | ||
| ::First of all, ]. "]" means that the ] must address the subject directly and in detail and not just a passing mention. | |||
| ::Your lack of experience makes it concerning. Your obvious lack of understanding with regard to basic policies and guidelines makes it a problem but I will ] and that is why I will ignore the personal attacks here and on ]. ]<sup>]</sup> 10:09, 9 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:13, 9 March 2015
Mansi Dovhal
- Mansi Dovhal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject of the article fail WP:GNG. I can't find the significant coverages in reliable sources that established the subject notability, perhaps WP:TOOSOON if ever. WP:IMDB is not a reliable sources. Wikic¤l¤gy 11:35, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep: Nominator failed to notice the coverage provided in the article itself. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 16:39, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
- Inclusion of subject on wikipedia is beyond a passing mention and notability is not inherited. Evidence of subject notability is not the same as evidence of subject existence. Evidence of subject notability requires a wide discussions of the subject in multiple independent reliable sources. A passing mention is enough for evidence of subject existence which you had shown in your article under deletion discussion here. When she becomes notable for her work in the future, we may consider a stand-alone article but too soon to be a subject of encyclopedic. Wikic¤l¤gy 19:50, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gy 11:51, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
- Comment: The sources provided is just an evidence that she's doing her job as a non-notable actress and not an evidence of meeting our inclusion criteria.
- I took my time to check the references/sources one-by-one. Ref 1 is WP:IMDB and that is not a reliable source. Ref 2 discussed the movie titled "Rakhtbeej" in detail and not the subject of the article. Ref 5 is a mere photo-gallery of Aamir Khan. Ref 4 and 6 discussed the same Aamir Khan in detail with a passing mention of the subject of this article and everyone will agree with me that notability is not inherited. Ref 7 look promising but not enough to merit an encyclopedic article for now, perhaps WP:TOOSOON. Wikic¤l¤gy 19:50, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:45, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
- Comment: Wikicology: In response to what you stated above, I have left a message on your talk page. You really need to understand the reasons better before putting any more articles for deletion since your track record on WP:AfD is very poor and 57% of your nominations failed and you have just increased work for other editors. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 05:09, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
- First of all, learn to use wikilinks. "Significant coverages" means that the reliable sources must address the subject directly and in detail and not just a passing mention.
- Your lack of experience makes it concerning. Your obvious lack of understanding with regard to basic policies and guidelines makes it a problem but I will WP:AGF and that is why I will ignore the personal attacks here and on my talk page. Wikic¤l¤gy 10:09, 9 March 2015 (UTC)