User talk:184.153.42.6: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 01:17, 10 March 2015 editFreeknowledgecreator (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users179,107 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit		Revision as of 01:30, 10 March 2015 edit undoGeneral Ization (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers165,786 edits Warning: Edit warring on Critique of Pure Reason. (TW)Next edit →
Line 32:		Line 32:

	Please read ] immediately. Your edits at ] place you in danger of violating this policy. Please be aware that if you are reverted, the appropriate thing to do is go to to the talk page and discuss your changes, not to keep making them over and over again. ] gives advice on such situations. If you continue to edit war, it will continue to be reverted. ] (]) 01:17, 10 March 2015 (UTC)		Please read ] immediately. Your edits at ] place you in danger of violating this policy. Please be aware that if you are reverted, the appropriate thing to do is go to to the talk page and discuss your changes, not to keep making them over and over again. ] gives advice on such situations. If you continue to edit war, it will continue to be reverted. ] (]) 01:17, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

			== March 2015 ==
			] You currently appear to be engaged in an ] according to the reverts you have made on ]. Users are expected to ] with others, to avoid editing ], and to ] rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.<br>
			Please be particularly aware that ] states:
			# '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made'''.
			# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.'''
			In particular, editors should be aware of the ], which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, '''breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a ]'''.
			If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents ] among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-ew --> <span style="font-family: Gill Sans MT, Arial, Helvetica; font-weight:100;">]</span> <sup>''] ''</sup> 01:30, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
			:''If this is a ], and you did not make the edits, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice -->

Revision as of 01:30, 10 March 2015

Welcome!

Hello, 184.153.42.6, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome!

Your edit summary here made my day. Ben Mac Dui 20:39, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

August 2014

Thank you for your contributions to Misplaced Pages. I noticed your recent edit to Cristina Fernández de Kirchner‎ does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history.

The edit summary appears in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Jetstreamer 22:52, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

3RR

Please read WP:3RR immediately. Your edits at Critique of Pure Reason place you in danger of violating this policy. Please be aware that if you are reverted, the appropriate thing to do is go to to the talk page and discuss your changes, not to keep making them over and over again. WP:BRD gives advice on such situations. If you continue to edit war, it will continue to be reverted. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 01:17, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

March 2015

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Critique of Pure Reason. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. Dwpaul 01:30, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.