Talk:Venus: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 01:13, 26 February 2015 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk \| contribs)Bots, Template editors2,302,381 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:Venus/Archive 2) (bot← Previous edit		Revision as of 18:14, 19 March 2015 edit undoWavyinfinity (talk \| contribs)220 edits →Formation of Venus: new sectionNext edit →
Line 84:		Line 84:
	Venus which is near to the earth, and is not a suitable place to get settled due to high pressure and temperature according to recent research. Some notices about this planet can be studied from this website: . --] (]) 17:17, 25 February 2015 (UTC)		Venus which is near to the earth, and is not a suitable place to get settled due to high pressure and temperature according to recent research. Some notices about this planet can be studied from this website: . --] (]) 17:17, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
	:Actually, up in its atmosphere the conditions are relatively benign. The website you point to actually hints to that. --] (]) 17:24, 25 February 2015 (UTC)		:Actually, up in its atmosphere the conditions are relatively benign. The website you point to actually hints to that. --] (]) 17:24, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

			== Formation of Venus ==

			There is a lot of information on Venus but no subtitle which outlines how this object formed. As well, how exactly would an object, so called Earth's twin, have such different features such as no strong global magnetic field, active plate tectonics, water oceans or life? Seems to me we are studying an object which is NOT Earth's twin.] (]) 18:14, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:14, 19 March 2015

This article is written in British English with Oxford spelling (colour, realize, organization, analyse; note that -ize is used instead of -ise) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Venus article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 2 months

Template:Vital article

Venus is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Misplaced Pages community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

Venus is part of the Solar System series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Misplaced Pages community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page as Today's featured article on March 28, 2005.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
November 11, 2004	Featured article candidate	Promoted
May 10, 2006	Featured article review	Demoted
June 16, 2006	Featured article candidate	Promoted
October 15, 2006	Featured topic candidate	Promoted
January 8, 2008	Featured article review	Kept
August 27, 2008	Featured topic candidate	Not promoted
Current status: Featured article

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Astronomy: Astronomical objects Top‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Misplaced Pages.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects.

Astronomy: Solar System

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Misplaced Pages.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Solar System task force.

Template:WP1.0

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Venus. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Venus at the Reference desk.

Semi-protected edit request on 19 August 2014

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Under current and future missions please replace the date "2014" with "2016" when referring to the ESA's BepiColombo mission as 2014 is incorrect with 2016 being the projected launch year. — Preceding unsigned comment added by IndicaXSS (talk • contribs) 08:40, 19 August 2014 (UTC) Reference: http://sci.esa.int/bepicolombo/47346-fact-sheet/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.17.159.76 (talk) 10:20, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Done E _CK _SA E _S 18:28, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Main image

Shouldn't the main image represent what the planet actually looks like, instead of a false-colour radar image without clouds? Serendi ous 22:03, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Perhaps. Tetra quark (talk) 03:00, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Agreed. I'd like to see it switched back, and plan to do so in the next couple weeks if there are no objections. —Torchiest _edits 20:45, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

@Torchiest: Now that the image has been changed, I started to miss the old one. The previous image is just a surface view from a radar, but it looks so much better :/ Tetra quark 14:32, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

surface image of Venus

I know the current image shows Venus as it actually looks like, but it is blurry and is low quality. The previous one, although possibly misleading, was much better looking. I would change it back Tetra quark 14:31, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

The HAVOC proposal

Should the article mention NASA's HAVOC proposal (High Altitude Venus Operational Concept)? A summary by NASA as well as a video can be viewed at http://sacd.larc.nasa.gov/branches/space-mission-analysis-branch-smab/smab-projects/havoc/

Mhklein (talk) 06:11, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

I don't think a speculative mission belongs in the main Venus article. IMO, the perfect place for it is in this table. A2soup (talk) 06:23, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Venus twin to earth

Venus which is near to the earth, and is not a suitable place to get settled due to high pressure and temperature according to recent research. Some notices about this planet can be studied from this website: . --MansourJE (talk) 17:17, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Actually, up in its atmosphere the conditions are relatively benign. The website you point to actually hints to that. --JorisvS (talk) 17:24, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Formation of Venus

There is a lot of information on Venus but no subtitle which outlines how this object formed. As well, how exactly would an object, so called Earth's twin, have such different features such as no strong global magnetic field, active plate tectonics, water oceans or life? Seems to me we are studying an object which is NOT Earth's twin.Wavyinfinity (talk) 18:14, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Categories: