| Revision as of 21:12, 23 March 2015 editSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,555,978 editsm Signing comment by Michaeltsantini - "→In culture - Change this title to - In culture and religious thought: new section"← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:18, 23 March 2015 edit undoMichaeltsantini (talk | contribs)76 edits →In culture - Change this title to - In culture and religious thoughtNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{British English Oxford spelling}} | |||
| {{Talk header}} | |||
| {{Vital article|topic= Science |level=3|class=FA}} | |||
| {{ArticleHistory | |||
| |action1=FAC | |||
| |action1date=16:50, 11 Nov 2004 | |||
| |action1link=Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/Venus (planet) | |||
| |action1result=promoted | |||
| |action1oldid=7346492 | |||
| |action2=FAR | |||
| |action2date=23:36, 10 May 2006 | |||
| |action2link=Misplaced Pages:Featured article removal candidates/Venus | |||
| |action2result=demoted | |||
| |action2oldid=52556019 | |||
| |action3=FAC | |||
| |action3date=21:34, 16 June 2006 | |||
| |action3link=Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/Venus | |||
| |action3result=promoted | |||
| |action3oldid=58963135 | |||
| |action4=FTC | |||
| |action4date=22:45, 15 October 2006 | |||
| |action4link=Misplaced Pages:Featured topic candidates/Solar System/archive1 | |||
| |action4result=promoted | |||
| |action4oldid=81576680 | |||
| |action5=FAR | |||
| |action5date=19:04, 8 January 2008 | |||
| |action5link=Misplaced Pages:Featured article review/Venus/archive1 | |||
| |action5result=kept | |||
| |action5oldid=183001119 | |||
| |action6=FTC | |||
| |action6date=16:57, 27 August 2008 | |||
| |action6link=Misplaced Pages:Featured topic candidates/Planets in the Solar System/archive1 | |||
| |action6result=not promoted | |||
| |maindate=March 28, 2005 | |||
| |ftname=Solar System | |||
| |currentstatus=FA | |||
| }} | |||
| {{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= | |||
| {{WikiProject Astronomy|class=FA|importance=Top|object=yes}} | |||
| {{WikiProject Solar System|class=FA|importance=Top}} | |||
| {{WP1.0|v0.5=pass|class=FA|category=Natsci|VA=yes|WPCD=yes|core=yes|importance=High}}}} | |||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
| |maxarchivesize = 190K | |||
| |counter = 2 | |||
| |algo = old(60d) | |||
| |archive = Talk:Venus/Archive %(counter)d | |||
| }} | |||
| {{notaforum}} | |||
| == Semi-protected edit request on 19 August 2014 == | |||
| {{edit semi-protected|answered=yes}} | |||
| Under current and future missions please replace the date "2014" with "2016" when referring to the ESA's BepiColombo mission as 2014 is incorrect with 2016 being the projected launch year. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 08:40, 19 August 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| Reference: | |||
| http://sci.esa.int/bepicolombo/47346-fact-sheet/ <small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 10:20, 4 January 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| :] '''Done'''<!-- Template:ESp --> ] 18:28, 4 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ==Main image== | |||
| Shouldn't the main image represent what the planet actually looks like, instead of a false-colour radar image without clouds? <b>]]<font color="#00b">]</font></b> 22:03, 15 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :Perhaps. '''] (])''' 03:00, 19 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::Agreed. I'd like to see it switched back, and plan to do so in the next couple weeks if there are no objections. —<B>]</B> <sup>]</sup><sub style="margin-left:-3ex;">]</sub> 20:45, 5 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :::{{ping|Torchiest}} Now that the image has been changed, I started to miss the old one. The previous image is just a surface view from a radar, but it looks so much better :/ '''] <sup>(])'''</sup> 14:32, 24 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == surface image of Venus == | |||
| I know the current image shows Venus as it actually looks like, but it is blurry and is low quality. The previous one, although possibly misleading, was much better looking. I would change it back '''] <sup>(])'''</sup> 14:31, 25 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == The HAVOC proposal == | |||
| Should the article mention NASA's HAVOC proposal (High Altitude Venus Operational Concept)? A summary by NASA as well as a video can be viewed at http://sacd.larc.nasa.gov/branches/space-mission-analysis-branch-smab/smab-projects/havoc/ | |||
| ] (]) 06:11, 19 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :I don't think a speculative mission belongs in the main Venus article. IMO, the perfect place for it is in ]. ] (]) 06:23, 19 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == Venus twin to earth == | |||
| Venus which is near to the earth, and is not a suitable place to get settled due to high pressure and temperature according to recent research. Some notices about this planet can be studied from this website: . --] (]) 17:17, 25 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :Actually, up in its atmosphere the conditions are relatively benign. The website you point to actually hints to that. --] (]) 17:24, 25 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == Formation of Venus == | |||
| There is a lot of information on Venus but no subtitle which outlines how this object formed. As well, how exactly would an object, so called Earth's twin, have such different features such as no strong global magnetic field, active plate tectonics, water oceans or life? Seems to me we are studying an object which is NOT Earth's twin.] (]) 18:14, 19 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == In culture - Change this title to - In culture and religious thought == | == In culture - Change this title to - In culture and religious thought == | ||
| Add the following second paragraph to this section (paragraph will sit right above the Etymology section). | Add the following second paragraph to this section (paragraph will sit right above the Etymology section). | ||
| A book published by Christian thinkers in 2014 titled ''Venus: Don't Go There - What Science and Religion Reveal about Life after Death'' presents the planet Venus as an appropriate biblical model for where condemned souls go after the Day of Judgment. The text argues that heaven, hell, and the lake of fire exist in material form within space and time and are not just abstract ideas. </ref> </ref> |
A book published by Christian thinkers in 2014 titled ''Venus: Don't Go There - What Science and Religion Reveal about Life after Death'' presents the planet Venus as an appropriate biblical model for where condemned souls go after the Day of Judgment. The text argues that heaven, hell, and the lake of fire exist in material form within space and time and are not just abstract ideas. </ref> </ref> | ||
| <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] | |||
Revision as of 21:18, 23 March 2015
In culture - Change this title to - In culture and religious thought
Add the following second paragraph to this section (paragraph will sit right above the Etymology section).
A book published by Christian thinkers in 2014 titled Venus: Don't Go There - What Science and Religion Reveal about Life after Death presents the planet Venus as an appropriate biblical model for where condemned souls go after the Day of Judgment. The text argues that heaven, hell, and the lake of fire exist in material form within space and time and are not just abstract ideas. </ref> BlueInk Book Review Services </ref>
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Michaeltsantini