Misplaced Pages

User talk:Victoriaearle: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:06, 2 April 2015 editRationalobserver (talk | contribs)11,997 edits Can we please just talk to each other?: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 19:16, 2 April 2015 edit undoVictoriaearle (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers62,095 edits Can we please just talk to each other?: reNext edit →
Line 25: Line 25:


Per I wondered if we could discuss our issues in hopes of moving forward in a positive way. We've never even had a proper discussion, and often I've felt that you were talking past me without really acknowledging my replies. For example, can you please explain why two or three times you encouraged me to upload pictures from the Huntington Library, but when I told you it wasn't safe you didn't acknowledge me? That seemed like a possible sabotage attempt. I think that we need to talk this out and achieve some closure without lost of others piling it on. Can we do this? ] (]) 19:06, 2 April 2015 (UTC) Per I wondered if we could discuss our issues in hopes of moving forward in a positive way. We've never even had a proper discussion, and often I've felt that you were talking past me without really acknowledging my replies. For example, can you please explain why two or three times you encouraged me to upload pictures from the Huntington Library, but when I told you it wasn't safe you didn't acknowledge me? That seemed like a possible sabotage attempt. I think that we need to talk this out and achieve some closure without lost of others piling it on. Can we do this? ] (]) 19:06, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

:RO, I couldn't answer. I got edit conflicted a gazillion times, supper was in the oven burning, the PR got closed in the middle of a conversation. So I let it slide. As it happens, I disagree with those assessments - unless the photographers, all of whom died more than 70 years ago, turned copyright directly to the Huntington, they should be in the public domain, unless they were published in books, I suppose. I wouldn't suggest materials if I didn't think they could be used, or to sabotage. I really don't operate like that. ] (]) 19:16, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:16, 2 April 2015

Formerly User:Truthkeeper88

Bertin

I am unable to fit in the image of Baronne de Rothschild at this time. But believe me I tired, which I suppose is good enough. Suggestions welcome. To compensate, here is 15th c fatalism married with 20th century minimilism: . Ceoil (talk) 04:04, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Not to worry, wasn't a mandate - only an observation that I'd noticed she was gone, but not meant to be actionable. Tks for work to I. Victoria (tk) 05:04, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Isabeau of Bavaria

Thank you for giving us this "interesting story", precious again, thanks extended to those you kindly mentioned in the nomination, Ceoil, Wehwalt and Tim riley (who I think watch this beautiful page). This will be the last TFA of a woman in women's history month. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:32, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks to you it got to TFA. Condolences, btw. Victoria (tk) 18:07, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
Thank you. People die, and some people here argue about hidden messages, - it's so unseemly. Thanks for understanding, Victoria, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:39, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
Fasinating, interesting page - a very worthy subject. Congratulations Giano (talk) 19:10, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Irataba PR

I'm struggling to understand what it is you want to add, so can I ask why you are not willing to write it and add it yourself? Rationalobserver (talk) 20:14, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

It;s a peer review RO, Victoria only needs to comment! Thankyou for your input at the peer review Victoria. Irataba is now at FAC, I hope you'll appreciate that a lot of hard work and effort has gone into addressing criticism to improve this here. Cheers.♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:09, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi, think it's okay to point out that a source like this is deeply satirical and borderline racist or to point out that the date for the Whipple party was incorrect. There were too many edit conflicts at the PR and I couldn't respond to ROs pings, so I let it go, and then you left this message that it's gone to FAC. I realize I probably made enemies by speaking up, but I'm not in complete agreement with the silence of culture on WP. Anyway, I'll keep quiet now and not comment at the FAC. Victoria (tk) 11:14, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Can we please just talk to each other?

Per this comment I wondered if we could discuss our issues in hopes of moving forward in a positive way. We've never even had a proper discussion, and often I've felt that you were talking past me without really acknowledging my replies. For example, can you please explain why two or three times you encouraged me to upload pictures from the Huntington Library, but when I told you it wasn't safe you didn't acknowledge me? That seemed like a possible sabotage attempt. I think that we need to talk this out and achieve some closure without lost of others piling it on. Can we do this? Rationalobserver (talk) 19:06, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

RO, I couldn't answer. I got edit conflicted a gazillion times, supper was in the oven burning, the PR got closed in the middle of a conversation. So I let it slide. As it happens, I disagree with those assessments - unless the photographers, all of whom died more than 70 years ago, turned copyright directly to the Huntington, they should be in the public domain, unless they were published in books, I suppose. I wouldn't suggest materials if I didn't think they could be used, or to sabotage. I really don't operate like that. Victoria (tk) 19:16, 2 April 2015 (UTC)