| Revision as of 23:35, 7 April 2015 edit5 albert square (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators68,587 edits →Bhaktivedanta College wiki page: closed conversation, already answered on Materialscientist's talk page← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:34, 8 April 2015 edit undoKennster2015 (talk | contribs)36 edits →Thank You For Editing Something That Didn't Need To Be Edited: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 84: | Line 84: | ||
| Any thoughts/suggestions/fixes? : ) - <b>]</b> 12:53, 7 April 2015 (UTC) | Any thoughts/suggestions/fixes? : ) - <b>]</b> 12:53, 7 April 2015 (UTC) | ||
| == Thank You For Editing Something That Didn't Need To Be Edited == | |||
| Dear ClueBot, | |||
| Thank you for editing something that didn't need to be edited. It was perfectly ok! | |||
| Thank you! | |||
Revision as of 02:34, 8 April 2015
ClueBot NG Links!Report False Positives • Review edits for the dataset • Frequently Asked Questions False PositivesIf you believe that ClueBot NG has made a mistake, please follow the directions in the warning it gave or click here. Please do not report them here. It takes less time to report them to the correct location, and we can handle it more effectively if reported in the correct location. Purpose of this PageThis page is for comments on or questions about the ClueBots.The current status of ClueBot NG is: Running
Praise should go on the praise page. Barnstars and other awards should go on the awards page.
Use the "new section" button at the top of this page to add a new section. Use the link above each section to edit that section.
This page is automatically archived by ClueBot III.
The ClueBots' owner or someone else who knows the answer to your question will reply on this page.
Template:Archive box collapsible
| ClueBots | |
|---|---|
| ClueBot NG/Anti-vandalism · ClueBot II/ClueBot Script |  |
| ClueBot III/Archive · Talk page for all ClueBots |
 | Beware! This user's talk page is monitored by talk page watchers. Some of them even talk back. |
Question about indicies
I (not-so) recently had my username changed from Ajl772 to radar33. If I move the indices page from User:ClueBot III/Indices/User talk:Ajl772 to User:ClueBot III/Indices/User talk:Radar33 (and any other of my userpages), will it screw up Cluebot's script, or will it still function okay?
I don't monitor Misplaced Pages as much as I used to, so if you would be to kind as to leave me a message on my talk page, or at least a notice that a response has been made here, I'd appreciate that. – radar 04:03, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
- I just realized that ClueBot isn't even archiving my talk page, so this is somewhat of a moot point. My curiosity still wants to be fed, though. – radar 04:44, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) @Radar33: No, ClueBot III (talk · contribs) doesn't archive your talk page, because it's not set up to do so. Your talk page has {{User:MiszaBot/config}} which means that archiving is performed by lowercase sigmabot III (talk · contribs). --Redrose64 (talk) 09:21, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
- Initially, I had ClueBot III archiving my talk page, but CB3 was down for a lengthy portion of time, so I ended up switching to MiszaBot (which ended up getting rolled into lowercase sigma bot 3). – radar 18:17, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
- I'm pretty sure if you set up the ClueBot III "Archive This" template on your talk page now, it would simply create new indices for your talk page, ignoring the old ones. All data will simply be regenerated. --I am k6ka See what I have done 14:48, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
- Initially, I had ClueBot III archiving my talk page, but CB3 was down for a lengthy portion of time, so I ended up switching to MiszaBot (which ended up getting rolled into lowercase sigma bot 3). – radar 18:17, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) @Radar33: No, ClueBot III (talk · contribs) doesn't archive your talk page, because it's not set up to do so. Your talk page has {{User:MiszaBot/config}} which means that archiving is performed by lowercase sigmabot III (talk · contribs). --Redrose64 (talk) 09:21, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Bhaktivedanta College wiki page
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
hi!
we are trying to update the wiki page for bhaktivedanta college radhadesh. i am not familiar with the rules how texts should be added. can you kindly let me know why our text is reverted by you? or, if you know how it is done, maybe you can adjust our text. I see the issue with the photos displayed also. not great at all. would be nice to change them also.
thank you!
with best regards, dinadayal dasa (BC staff member) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.132.232.171 (talk) 08:57, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.Govindudu Andarivadele
An IP user is repeatedly adding content from non reliable sources and i reverted it twice. That user added it for the third time and i explained the reason about my edits patiently. Please revert that IP's edit on the article because i cant do so adhering to WP:3RR. Thank you. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 09:32, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Pavanjandhyala
- ClueBot NG is not human and therefore cannot revert edits on request. I have checked the article and the disruption now appears to have stopped :)--5 albert square (talk) 23:28, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Level 4 archiving
According to what I'm reading, Cluebot should be able to be set all the way to level 7.
I set it for 4, and had some odd results. please check the history of Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Requests for closure, for the last several bot edits.
It is also archiving "some" level 3 headers (though not others), which, from my understanding it shouldn't be doing at all.
Any thoughts/suggestions/fixes? : ) - jc37 12:53, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Thank You For Editing Something That Didn't Need To Be Edited
Dear ClueBot,
Thank you for editing something that didn't need to be edited. It was perfectly ok!
Thank you!