Misplaced Pages

User:JoeSperrazza: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:53, 27 March 2015 editJoeSperrazza (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers16,945 edits update← Previous edit Revision as of 06:07, 19 April 2015 edit undoDavew123 (talk | contribs)67 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 24: Line 24:


] ]

Joe, including fully granted patents in articles is not disruptive. Maybe you should ask the fraud office why not? ] (]) 06:07, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:07, 19 April 2015

JoeSperrazza
This user previously used another account: 4wajzkd02.
This user has been on Misplaced Pages for 17 years, 8 months and 17 days.
19,000+This user has made more than 19,000 contributions to Misplaced Pages.
This editor is a Veteran Editor III and is entitled to display this Silver Editor Star.
This user is a native of the United States of America.
WikiProject User warningsThis user participates in
WikiProject User Warnings.
This user is a member of
the Guild of Copy Editors.
Misplaced Pages editor
This is a Wikipedia user page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JoeSperrazza.

About me

  • Edit counts: +
  • Articles created: +
  • Contribution survey: +

My views on Misplaced Pages

  • I enjoy reading articles here, and sometimes use them as a starting point for research, or as a suggested point of reference for others
  • When time and knowledge allow, I want to "give back" to the project by contributing effort
  • I value collegiality

Joe, including fully granted patents in articles is not disruptive. Maybe you should ask the fraud office why not? Davew123 (talk) 06:07, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Categories: