Misplaced Pages

Talk:West Pier: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 08:37, 3 May 2015 editRitchie333 (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators125,314 edits →Lead: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 00:14, 4 May 2015 edit undo186.9.130.128 (talk) →LeadNext edit →
Line 17: Line 17:


Just a quick note on the lead, the opening paragraph should give a brief overview of the important parts of the topic (in this case location, opening, closing, dereliction and Grade I listing). See ] for more. ] ] ] 08:37, 3 May 2015 (UTC) Just a quick note on the lead, the opening paragraph should give a brief overview of the important parts of the topic (in this case location, opening, closing, dereliction and Grade I listing). See ] for more. ] ] ] 08:37, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

:The lead section is supposed to give the quick overview of the important parts of the topic. The first paragraph should say what the article is about but does not act as a lead section for the lead section. Duplicating material and ordering the lead illogically is not supported by any style guidelines. ] (]) 00:13, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:14, 4 May 2015

West Pier is currently an Art and architecture good article nominee. Nominated by Ritchie333 at 16:22, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria and will decide whether or not to list it as a good article. Comments are welcome from any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article. This review will be closed by the first reviewer. To add comments to this review, click discuss review and edit the page.


WikiProject iconBrighton B‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Brighton, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource about Brighton and Hove. If you would like to participate, please visit the project pageBrightonWikipedia:WikiProject BrightonTemplate:WikiProject BrightonBrighton
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.
WikiProject iconArchitecture B‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Definitely needs work

This article manages simultaneously to be slanted toward (relatively) recent events and not up to date! - Jmabel | Talk 22:18, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Source for listing

At the moment the pier's listed status is mentioned in the lead but not the body of the article. It was first listed in 1969 and here's the source but I've not added it myself because I'm not quite sure how it would best fit in the narrative. Nev1 (talk) 01:45, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Opening date

5 August 1872 was the opening date for Hastings Pier. Brighton's West Pier opened on 6 October 1866. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.6.156.95 (talk) 12:16, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Lead

Just a quick note on the lead, the opening paragraph should give a brief overview of the important parts of the topic (in this case location, opening, closing, dereliction and Grade I listing). See MOS:BEGIN for more. Ritchie333 08:37, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

The lead section is supposed to give the quick overview of the important parts of the topic. The first paragraph should say what the article is about but does not act as a lead section for the lead section. Duplicating material and ordering the lead illogically is not supported by any style guidelines. 186.9.130.128 (talk) 00:13, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Categories: