| Revision as of 22:50, 13 May 2015 editJayumpire (talk | contribs)5 edits →2016 Obama's America edits undone: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:28, 14 May 2015 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,303,736 editsm Archiving 3 discussion(s) to User talk:TheRedPenOfDoom/Archive 18) (botNext edit → | ||
| Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
| sir.... | sir.... | ||
| its not like that Mishti wants to control what goes on wikipedia... its that we want the article with full and true information.. we didnt mean to say that.................... | its not like that Mishti wants to control what goes on wikipedia... its that we want the article with full and true information.. we didnt mean to say that.................... | ||
| ==Disambiguation link notification for May 3== | |||
| Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] ( | ). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 09:19, 3 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == Undid Edit == | |||
| {{archive top|Social Justice Warriors have more important things to do than to try and housebreak sea lions. }} | |||
| I used a primary source to back up my statistics. Why was it reverted? ] (]) 15:23, 3 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :{{ping|Destructor3}} because you used a ]. -- ] 15:27, 3 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::So you are saying that an article about how many members of a subreddit there are is more reliable then the numbers directly from a subreddit? ] (]) 15:29, 3 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :::Yes. For Misplaced Pages, the ] than ]. -- ] 15:34, 3 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Wow. This website is in DESPERATE need of change. That is the most ridiculous thing ive ever heard of. ] (]) 18:53, 3 May 2015 (UTC)' | |||
| ::::Also, its not something thats up for interpretation. ITS A FUCKING STATISTIC. Its ridiculous how biased and un-neutral the admins are here. | |||
| :::::There is all the analysis of how much that that particular site actually represents something that has no official site, how many of the sign ins are actual supporters, how many are trolls, how many are there to voice objections and how many are merely socks attempting to boost the impression that the harassment group is representative of gamers rather than merely a fringe of a fringe. As Mark Twain stated, "There are 3 type of lies: White lies, damn lies and statistics." -- ] 19:23, 3 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::So, by your logic, if i went out made a blog and said that gamergate has 8 million supporters i could just just that as facts. Your logic is so flawed it is silly. There are so many people that support gamergate that a hashtag about pizza of all things was made trending just because of how many people they had do it. SJWs like you are an even smaller group known as the vocal minority, except you have a bit of power. But i'm sure that like everywhere else with cowardly, white knight, sjw mods you will just ban me. ] (]) 00:52, 4 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::{{ping|Destructor3}} I am pretty sure I never called you a reliable source. I dont have time or energy to try to teach someone about wikipedia who will not even read the links provided. Good bye. Please do not come to my page again. -- ] 02:07, 4 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::{{TPS}} {{ping|Destructor3}} That wouldn't make any sense at all and no experienced editor here would encourage you to do that or tell you such a thing was okay. See ] or ].. If you're concerned about being banned, (indefinitely blocked is often mistaken as "banned") the quickest way to have that happen is to go down the ignoble avenue of personal attacks. Statements such as "SJWs like you" comments on the editor, not on their edits, which is a violation of ]. You're editing in a subject that fuels emotion. Only editors with thick skin should be editing in these venues. Regards, ] (]) 01:13, 4 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::You know man i really do have thick skin. But when someone with power decides to come along and just delete facts to further his own agenda it really pisses me off. ] (]) 01:16, 4 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::::(In retrospect, what I should have said was "level head" as "thick skin" implies an ability to absorb abuse, which is kinda the opposite of what I meant.) ] (]) 01:26, 4 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
| {{archive bottom}} | |||
| == Tempted to file SPI == | |||
| Hi T, I'm tempted to file an SPI report on the user who popped up to resubmit the same problematic content, although my instinct is that there might not be a direct relationship and I might be barking up the wrong tree. This "new" user has been somewhat active for a little while, although with only 942 edits. Thoughts? ] (]) 15:46, 3 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :{{ping|Cyphoidbomb}} I dont think they are specifically connected other than sharing the general misconception that Misplaced Pages is a fansite/celebrity gossip mag. -- ] 15:59, 3 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::Okeedoke. I'll put my sword back in the scabbard. ] (]) 16:07, 3 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == Sadda Haq (TV Series) page == | == Sadda Haq (TV Series) page == | ||
Revision as of 05:28, 14 May 2015
HURRY, HURRY, HURRY!
Step right up and see a treasury of pinnipeds right before your very eyes!
The next act in only 4 days and 10 edits.
The most ethical show in the big top!
| This is TheRedPenOfDoom's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20Auto-archiving period: 10 days  |
 Archives | ||||||||||||||||||||
Index
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
And there is also This archive.
Please note that the Presidency University, Kolkata page has been vandalised
Please correct / delete unreferenced comments such as 'Hence all corruptions are tucked away under the cupboard.' The citations are to blogs hosted by specific individuals / interest groups.
- !!!!
hello now plz listen to me
Sir.... then help us to edit the page... the information that i edited are 100% true...but u say refrence must be given... what if i give u conformation message on Mishti Mam's Verified facebook account that the facts r true..
well..dont go on wrong note
sir.... its not like that Mishti wants to control what goes on wikipedia... its that we want the article with full and true information.. we didnt mean to say that....................
Sadda Haq (TV Series) page
Hi, I will edit the plot summary of that page & this time I will write it briefly. Thanks for the helping guide links. Hcns (talk) 13:02, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Name lists
I realise that you have explained it but I can't get my head round this. Someone has described it as "pedantry" and, well, it certainly seems odd. Sure, it could be converted to a dab but I notice that we do have a category for lists of people who share a name. What it very specifically is not is a list of people from a caste. That was the entire point of the exercise, given that last name is not verification of caste. Indeed, that particular list is an extremely good example of the general principle because Helen Reddy is in the mix and the chances of her being a Reddy are as near to zero as makes no difference.
I think you probably need to take this to some sort of community decision-making forum, not the list talk page. I am not unduly fussed whether it stays as a list or as a dab but I suspect that those obsessed with lists and with categories might have something to say. - Sitush (talk) 11:26, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Not to put pressure on you
But how long will it take the conflict involving the Newsweek article to be resolved? Leave a message on my talk page so I can see the notification. Ylevental (talk) 18:43, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Dude, whats your problem
Why you are reverting the page, https://en.wikipedia.org/Sant_Longowal_Institute_of_Engineering_and_Technology again and again.
And if i had marked the "template:IN Use" then cant you understand or read. That im working on it, do not interfere. You kept on reverting it. Hello, redpen or whatever you are. I am requesting you if you please stop reverting the changes, instead help me in that to make it more better. Instead of giving me bullshit comments "Last Best Version" and all.
Please, can you please cant confirm before reverting it again and again. C'mon im not idiot searching all the web to extract info. And you just revert it back. I am doing something. And moreover, before reverting next time. Please read other Indian college/universities pages. They are also providing the same info. Then whats wrong in this. If the way of presenting it is incorrect, then guide or make it correct. Atleast guide me, to make it worthy not useless by crapping it into 4-5 lines. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Szmohitkumar (talk • contribs) 07:28, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
Arbitration Enforcement Request
Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#TheRedPenOfDoom 168.1.75.18 (talk) 07:29, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
- I do wonder which editor it was that was so afraid of this request backfiring that they had to use a (now blocked) proxy IP to post it. PeterTheFourth (talk) 08:05, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Note, I have closed the AE request without action, but also without reviewing the merits of the complaint, see the AE closing notes for details. Zad68 14:31, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
2016 Obama's America edits undone
Dear Red Pen of Doom, Last year I made numerous edits to the wiki page about the movie 2016 Obama's America for which I was the lead producer and executive producer. I founded the company that created the movie and yet I was nearly completely written out of the wikipage, unlike the IMDb page (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2247692/fullcredits). I made changes to correct errors about my involvement and other people's involvement, which in many cases is vastly overstated. As an example, I founded the business and hired Gerald Molen, yet he is credited on the wiki page for my role and activities. This might be complicated for you because there was a significant legal dispute between myself and Mr. D'Souza, which I attempted to provide a clear understanding of the dispute and referenced news articles that weren't merely press releases from Mr. D'Souza about his claims in the legal dispute. Lastly, I thought it was appropriate to include Mr. D'Souza's criminal activity that he himself references the movie as leading to his prosecution. Because this is my livelihood, I would appreciate if the wiki page changes I made were restored. I can provide additional documentation such as publicly available agreements forming the company and my position as the president, lead producer, lead executive producer, and co-founder of the company and movie. Thank you for your time and consideration. Jayumpire (talk) 22:50, 13 May 2015 (UTC)