| Revision as of 11:04, 26 May 2015 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,299,754 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:ATinySliver/Archive 2) (bot← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:18, 27 May 2015 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,299,754 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:ATinySliver/Archive 2) (botNext edit → | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| {{clear}} | {{clear}} | ||
| ==DYK nomination of Johnny's Theme== | |||
| ] Hello! Your submission of ] at the ] has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath ''']''' and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! <!--Template:DYKproblem--> ] (]) 20:58, 18 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :{{ping|Yoninah}} replied. Cheers! —]<b>/</b>] 21:18, 18 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :{{ping|Yoninah}} I haven't heard back from you; are your concerns addressed? {{p|size=22px}} —]<b>/</b>] 17:57, 19 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::Yes, everything's fine. I saw the note you added under my approval tick; it doesn't change the approval. Best, ] (]) 20:57, 19 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ==DYK for Johnny's Theme== | ==DYK for Johnny's Theme== | ||
Revision as of 04:18, 27 May 2015
| Messages may be ignored or receive only a curt reply if they involve anything not on my watchlist. No disrespect intended.I will usually ping you in any reply here. If you ping me elsewhere, I will reply there.Automatic archival by lowercase sigmabot III. |
Template:Archive box collapsible
DYK for Johnny's Theme
 | On 21 May 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Johnny's Theme, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that "Johnny's Theme", beamed to Tonight Show viewers from 1962 to 1992, was a cover song of a cover song of a cover song? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Johnny's Theme. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Panyd 01:49, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Dodgerfilms
The article Dodgerfilms has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- A handful of article about a one-time event does not make someone notable (everybody is famous for 15 minutes).
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DemocraticLuntz (talk) 00:56, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
- Respectfully, I reject PROD per my explanation at the article's talk page. —ATinySliver/ 01:16, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Dodgerfilms for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dodgerfilms is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Dodgerfilms until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --Non-Dropframe talk 04:19, 25 May 2015 (UTC)