| Revision as of 04:31, 6 June 2015 edit26oo (talk | contribs)2,181 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:46, 6 June 2015 edit undoBuckshot06 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users133,035 edits respNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| I have reverted your re-addition of the twisted, non-neutral material to this article. I will speak bluntly: things have changed around here (or at least, regarding Horn articles), and I have no intention of allowing material which twists the facts to be readded to these articles. Do this three times and you will be reported to AN/I (or blocked, as the template warns). Regards ] ] 04:28, 6 June 2015 (UTC) | I have reverted your re-addition of the twisted, non-neutral material to this article. I will speak bluntly: things have changed around here (or at least, regarding Horn articles), and I have no intention of allowing material which twists the facts to be readded to these articles. Do this three times and you will be reported to AN/I (or blocked, as the template warns). Regards ] ] 04:28, 6 June 2015 (UTC) | ||
| :Hi ], please do not threaten me. You are making bold changes before referring to the talk page. If you want to report me to AN/I then I am sure you have your reasons. However, please refer to the talk page. You've done the same with another article without even carrying out the changes you said you intended to do i.e moving content to more appropriate articles. ] (]) 04:31, 6 June 2015 (UTC) | :Hi ], please do not threaten me. You are making bold changes before referring to the talk page. If you want to report me to AN/I then I am sure you have your reasons. However, please refer to the talk page. You've done the same with another article without even carrying out the changes you said you intended to do i.e moving content to more appropriate articles. ] (]) 04:31, 6 June 2015 (UTC) | ||
| ::Thankyou for your note 26oo. I'm not trying to threaten you, but I'm not going to let your behaviour slide past. As you may be away, such bold edits are formally endorsed by ]. I did not appreciate that there were other users prepared to take the ] of reintroducing tainted material back into the encyclopedia. Right now I am working with an editor who may return a little more, if this kind of POVpushing is removed. Now, as regards ], the tendentious material about a new information system in the Somali MoFin, which I removed, I realised did not actually have a home. Given Somalia's heavily personalised governance, should we create ] or ]? What would be your opinion? ] ] 04:46, 6 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:46, 6 June 2015
 Archives |
Puntland Maritime Police Force
One of Misplaced Pages's fundamental policies is to present topics from a neutral point of view. This means articles must represent each outside view fairly and proportionally, but not present any single view as true. Your edits appear to violate this principle and introduce bias to the article. Please use the talk page to discuss controversial edits—if you do not, it is likely that your edits will simply be removed by others. You should also be aware that repeatedly inserting something breaks the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. Ignoring this may get you blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Thank you.
I have reverted your re-addition of the twisted, non-neutral material to this article. I will speak bluntly: things have changed around here (or at least, regarding Horn articles), and I have no intention of allowing material which twists the facts to be readded to these articles. Do this three times and you will be reported to AN/I (or blocked, as the template warns). Regards Buckshot06 (talk) 04:28, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Buckshot06, please do not threaten me. You are making bold changes before referring to the talk page. If you want to report me to AN/I then I am sure you have your reasons. However, please refer to the talk page. You've done the same with another article without even carrying out the changes you said you intended to do i.e moving content to more appropriate articles. 26oo (talk) 04:31, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
- Thankyou for your note 26oo. I'm not trying to threaten you, but I'm not going to let your behaviour slide past. As you may be away, such bold edits are formally endorsed by WP:BRD. I did not appreciate that there were other users prepared to take the WP:BURDEN of reintroducing tainted material back into the encyclopedia. Right now I am working with an editor who may return a little more, if this kind of POVpushing is removed. Now, as regards Corruption in Somalia, the tendentious material about a new information system in the Somali MoFin, which I removed, I realised did not actually have a home. Given Somalia's heavily personalised governance, should we create Ministry of Finance (Somalia) or Minister of Finance (Somalia)? What would be your opinion? Buckshot06 (talk) 04:46, 6 June 2015 (UTC)