| Revision as of 21:48, 30 July 2006 editCertified Gangsta (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,106 edits →{{user|Bonafide.hustla}}'s POV pushing← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:49, 30 July 2006 edit undoCertified Gangsta (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,106 editsm →{{user|Bonafide.hustla}}'s POV pushingNext edit → | ||
| Line 223: | Line 223: | ||
| I'm defeated. I'm out okay? Good job distorting all those info., must be real fun. Keep it up. I'm tired of editing all the junks you write and all your crusading. Pursuing in every possible ways, stalking me, etc. So I'm out and have fun POV pushing. It's time to make peace.--] 21:45, 30 July 2006 (UTC) | I'm defeated. I'm out okay? Good job distorting all those info., must be real fun. Keep it up. I'm tired of editing all the junks you write and all your crusading. Pursuing in every possible ways, stalking me, etc. So I'm out and have fun POV pushing. It's time to make peace.--] 21:45, 30 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| Leave me alone. I'm not editing anymore. Stop pursuing me understand?--] 21:48, 30 July 2006 (UTC) | Leave me alone. I'm not editing anymore or I'm gonna have an emotional breakdown <sighs>. Stop pursuing me understand?--] 21:48, 30 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 21:49, 30 July 2006
Welcome to Misplaced Pages!!!
|
Kukini 16:16, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
Please do not remove content from Misplaced Pages; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Deiaemeth 00:07, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
Hi
You're already in breach of the three revert rule on the Go (board game) article. If you continue with such edits, you're be immediately blocked. Please take your concerns to the article talk page and try and reach a consensus version. Deiaemeth 00:15, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
Blocked for 3RRV
 |
You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. |
Incidentally, I blocked your friend Dei as well. JoshuaZ 01:46, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for experimenting with Misplaced Pages. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --Rory096 07:32, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
Please do not remove warnings from your talk page or replace them with offensive content. Removing warnings from your talk page will not remove them from the page history. If you continue to remove warnings from your talk page, you will lose your privilege of editing your talk page. Thanks. --Rory096 07:57, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
108 Stars of Destiny
Theoretically, that article isn't supposed to just be on the Suikoden GAME series. That's why the stuff on the original story comes first. It's just that there's a lot more information (and editors who know stuff) about the games than the original. I'm not sure if it should be stuck in the Computer / Video Game category. SnowFire 00:01, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
Repeated violation
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. Deiaemeth 02:14, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
GunBound
The GunBound Article does not need expansion as it is already 30 kb in size and it is only by my work that I have been able to condense it into two separate articles. Freddie 14:26, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
PRC as emerging superpower
Hello, thanks for your contribs. I wish to talk to you about the Political factors and you keep adding "Influence in East Asia" as a factor. I have read your point and that point definitely doesn't belong in the Political factor. It's more about spread and the importance of Chinese culture in Japan, Korea etcetera, and hence, it is a Cultural factor (already included there) not a Political factor. The Political factor is reserved for either direct political influence, economic influence, or military influence (see the other examples), not cultural influence (which is soft power). Please understand this. I am the one who added all those political factor points originally, and you can trust me that I have considered everything. The only considerable political influence China has in another East Asian country is only in North Korea, but I don't think it's worth mentioning (i.e. it's China's backyard anyway). You also would need references for future contribs. Heilme 23:55, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
3RR
Same applies to you. And given you've been blocked for the 3RR before I think you have the problem, not me. John Smith's 22:23, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
"Vandalism"
You're not fooling anyone. You're making tendentious edits to Asia and China related articles and attempting to "warn" anyone who opposes you to stop making completely legitimate reverts. YINever 00:12, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on Lots of pages. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing. YINever 00:27, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
3RR block
I have looked at the complaint filed by YINever, and it appears that you have reverted four times within a 24hr span on Mao: The Unknown Story, leading to a 24hr block. Please use the talk page when this expires. your complaint against YINever does not appear to hold as the reverts need to be witihin a 24hr period Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 06:13, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
3RR
You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on 2008 Summer Olympics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing. 72.65.80.34 14:40, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing to Names of China. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. 72.65.80.34 15:11, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
Taiwan
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. 151.205.36.69 18:46, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
Anon IPs
User:72.65.68.229 and User:151.205.36.69 appears to be the IP addesss of TJive and YINever. Here he admitted it. --138.130.126.104 12:58, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
Your last edit on Singapore
I reverted your last edit of Singapore , because Malay is the national language of the country, and hence it deserves to be placed first, ahead of even English, which is just one of four official languages. If you have a reason to make the change, please discuss it on Talk:Singapore first. Thanks! Kimchi.sg 04:39, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
People's Republic of China 3RR warning
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. 141.153.114.88 00:34, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
3RR warning
You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on Chinese reunification. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing. 151.205.37.254 00:15, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on 2008 Summer Olympics. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing. 151.205.37.254 00:51, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
PLAN is not blue water
Stop dodging the issue. Just because India is on there doesn't mean the PLAN is blue water. Check the talk page with updated information. If you continue this edit war I will ask for arbitration. John Smith's 21:14, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
3RR on Bruce Lee
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing to Bruce Lee. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. 71.124.114.26
Repeated Violations
Please do not add nonsense to Misplaced Pages. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. 71.124.114.26
Masutatsu Oyama
Please do not remove content from Misplaced Pages; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. 71.124.114.26
Talk:Bruce Lee
Please do not remove content from Misplaced Pages; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. 71.124.114.26
Turtle ship
Please do not remove content from Misplaced Pages; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. 71.124.114.26
Yi Sun-sin
Please do not remove content from Misplaced Pages; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. 71.124.114.26
Imjin War
Please do not add nonsense to Misplaced Pages. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. 71.124.114.26
No personal attacks
Please do not make personal attacks on other people. Misplaced Pages has a policy against personal attacks. In some cases, users who engage in personal attacks may be blocked from editing by admins or banned by the arbitration committee. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Please resolve disputes appropriately. Thank you. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.124.114.26 (talk • contribs) .
- Unlike you, 71.124.114.26, I did not make any personal attacks. This is another one of your invalid warnings which you posted just to be spiteful. RevolverOcelotX
http://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/RevolverOcelotX
You cut and paste all my valid warnings onto my userpage which count as a personal attack. And keep signing my statements. Hahahahaha.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.124.114.26 (talk • contribs) .
- First, 71.124.114.26, please read the guideline, Misplaced Pages:Sign your posts on talk pages. And please read the policy Misplaced Pages:No personal attacks to try to grasp the policy of No personal attacks. Signing unsigned statements does not constitute a personal attack. However posts such as this and this do constitute personal attacks and threats. RevolverOcelotX
Other users feel the same way I do. Your edits are not based on content but whether or not you are angry at that user for an edit. 71.124.114.26
- It doesn't matter what you think User:YINever feel about me. What matters is that you don't post other user's comments on my talk page. Its very misleading. RevolverOcelotX
Why does your userpage have so many 3RR warnings? Because you are always angry. Hahahaha. 71.124.114.26
- I have posted here with my response. Let me know what you think. I'm going to bed. --Alphachimp 07:06, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
3RR warning
You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on List of Chinese Americans. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing. --Bonafide.hustla 01:04, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
- I've taken a look at the dispute and posted my opinion here. Regards, --Alphachimp 02:29, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
Warnings
Disputed warnings placed by 71.124.114.26 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) can be viewed here. Petros471 18:58, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
Political repression in the People's Republic of China
I fail to see the purpose of the category and should be deleted. Terrorist groups, an American memorial, and Chinese law enforcement agencies definitely does not belong there. Someone seems to have the idea that Chinese laws are created to repress. --PatCheng 16:07, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
chinese
Chinese 3RR warning
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. --Bonafide.hustla 05:43, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
Made 2 reverts in the last 24 hrs doesn't count as in danger of 3RR.--Bonafide.hustla 05:44, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 |
You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. |
You repeated the same edit four times. It is qualify for the 3RR breach. Please note that it is the third 3RR block you got in recent months, the next block could be significantly longer than that, so please, instead of edit warring try to ask for a third opinion or start a WP:RfC on the issue, or mediation. Edit warring is not a way to solve problems. abakharev 10:21, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
The first edit was definately not a revert. The first edit was a bold addition to the article which was completely unrelated to the older reverts and was unchallenged except by Bonafide.hustla (talk · contribs). Also note that there was no version which my first edit reverted to. This proves that my first edit was indeed NOT a revert. Therefore, there has only been 3 reverts between myself and Bonafide.hustla. The edit made was clearly (Taiwan) rather than "(on Taiwan)". Note that this is a subtle, but very important difference with different meanings. This edit was made according to Misplaced Pages:Naming conventions (Chinese), "on Taiwan" would refer to the island geographically, while (Taiwan) would refer to usually refer to the most common political name usage. Geographic and political references are very different. The first edit was used in a geographic context while the later ones equate the the political entity with its commonly used term. Unfortunately, this was repeatedly reverted by Bonafide.hustla (talk · contribs) who labeled the clear content dispute as "vandalism" as well as POV pushing on many other articles. Thus, there have been only 3 reverts between myself and Bonafide.hustla and there have been no policy violations in the mentioned article. If this was indeed a violation, then Bonafide.hustla (talk · contribs) should receive a block for 3RR as well since he was the person doing the other half of the reverting on the article. ]. The 3RR clearly states that a block should only occur if I have made MORE than 3 reverts in the last 24 hrs for an article, which did not happen in this case. It is obvious that the block on me is not justified. --RevolverOcelotX 08:57, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
- frankly, you were edit warring. And if I see either of you two edit warring again, I have a good mind to block both of you. Sasquatch t|c 18:36, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
Bonafide.hustla (talk · contribs)'s POV pushing
- In the interest of fairness to all those involved in the naming conventions dispute I've reverted Misplaced Pages:Naming conventions (Chinese) to a version which predates the current edit war. I know it's not a perfect arrangement, but for the moment I think it's the best I can do without interfering directly in the dispute itself. I've looked at Bonafide.hustla's contributions, while it's clear that he has some very strongly held opinions, for the moment it appears to be a content dispute. Mass reversions aside, I don't see any evidence of anything resembling blatant vandalism at the moment (i.e. sockpuppetry, really blatant misinformation... etc). I think it would be better for everyone and the project in the long term if you tried first to work out your disagreements through dialogue before pursuing further escalation. This is a sensitive topic for sure, but from past experience I do think consensus is possible. I will look into possible 3RR violations, however again, I'd stress that such blocks do not provide a long term solution. -Loren 07:08, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
- I've made Bonafide.hustla aware of the intent behind the 3RR. In the interest of finding an amicable solution to this dispute, let's just leave it at that for now. -Loren 07:46, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
I'm defeated. I'm out okay? Good job distorting all those info., must be real fun. Keep it up. I'm tired of editing all the junks you write and all your crusading. Pursuing in every possible ways, stalking me, etc. So I'm out and have fun POV pushing. It's time to make peace.--Bonafide.hustla 21:45, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
Leave me alone. I'm not editing anymore or I'm gonna have an emotional breakdown <sighs>. Stop pursuing me understand?--Bonafide.hustla 21:48, 30 July 2006 (UTC)