| Revision as of 04:10, 8 April 2006 editRpresser (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,561 edits notable? seems very frivolous← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:25, 31 July 2006 edit undoSYSS Mouse (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers6,166 edits commentNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| Is this software really ]? Who really cares about how much they type, unless they're worried about carpal tunnel? ] 04:10, 8 April 2006 (UTC) | Is this software really ]? Who really cares about how much they type, unless they're worried about carpal tunnel? ] 04:10, 8 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :Questionable, although I uses the program. Definitely not a speedy and it should not be proposed deleted. ] 03:25, 31 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:25, 31 July 2006
Can anyone let me know about WhatPulse for Linux?
- None yet, check the site for news... also, please sign comments on talk pages with four tildes. Jmax- 00:40, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
- The Windows client seems works for some versions (Don't ask me if it's the Windows client or the Windows nolag)
- Only when you type in the Geek Dialog.
- The Windows client seems works for some versions (Don't ask me if it's the Windows client or the Windows nolag)
Is this software really notable? Who really cares about how much they type, unless they're worried about carpal tunnel? Rpresser 04:10, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
- Questionable, although I uses the program. Definitely not a speedy and it should not be proposed deleted. SYSS Mouse 03:25, 31 July 2006 (UTC)