Misplaced Pages

User talk:82.11.33.86: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:00, 21 June 2015 editThomas.W (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers60,972 edits →June 2015: reply← Previous edit Revision as of 15:06, 21 June 2015 edit undoThomas.W (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers60,972 edits →June 2015: cmNext edit →
Line 5: Line 5:
::The text in the lede of the article, that is the beginning of it, is just a summary of material that is supposed to be further down in the article. So having a short mention in the lede and more text further down is not duplication, it's supposed to be that way. When removing the text you also removed all the sources for it, which makes your removal even more wrong. ] ] 14:55, 21 June 2015 (UTC) ::The text in the lede of the article, that is the beginning of it, is just a summary of material that is supposed to be further down in the article. So having a short mention in the lede and more text further down is not duplication, it's supposed to be that way. When removing the text you also removed all the sources for it, which makes your removal even more wrong. ] ] 14:55, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
:::{{ping|Thomas.W}} Is in lede already, "The Mukti Bahini was later supported by Indian forces which provided material support for the guerillas" second paragraph " It received extensive support from Indian allied forces during the war" fourth paragraph ] (]) 14:57, 21 June 2015 (UTC) :::{{ping|Thomas.W}} Is in lede already, "The Mukti Bahini was later supported by Indian forces which provided material support for the guerillas" second paragraph " It received extensive support from Indian allied forces during the war" fourth paragraph ] (]) 14:57, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
::::I know, and it's supposed to be that way, as I told you in the message you replied to. If your English isn't good enough for you to understand the messages and warnings you get, you shouldn't be editing here. ] ] 15:00, 21 June 2015 (UTC) ::::I have cleaned it up, removing some unsourced text in the article and some duplication, '''without''' removing any sources. ] ] 15:06, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:06, 21 June 2015

June 2015

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Misplaced Pages, as you did at Mukti Bahini, you may be blocked from editing. Warning for repeated removal of sourced content without a valid reason (see article talk). All warnings etc posted on your talk page can be seen in the page history, so deleting every warning you get does not erase your history. Thomas.W 14:46, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

@Thomas.W: Are people blind here? I say twice now why I delete, why give warning? 82.11.33.86 (talk) 14:49, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

The text in the lede of the article, that is the beginning of it, is just a summary of material that is supposed to be further down in the article. So having a short mention in the lede and more text further down is not duplication, it's supposed to be that way. When removing the text you also removed all the sources for it, which makes your removal even more wrong. Thomas.W 14:55, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
@Thomas.W: Is in lede already, "The Mukti Bahini was later supported by Indian forces which provided material support for the guerillas" second paragraph " It received extensive support from Indian allied forces during the war" fourth paragraph 82.11.33.86 (talk) 14:57, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
I have cleaned it up, removing some unsourced text in the article and some duplication, without removing any sources. Thomas.W 15:06, 21 June 2015 (UTC)