| Revision as of 10:07, 11 June 2015 editMaterialscientist (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators1,994,292 edits →May 2015← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:00, 26 June 2015 edit undoParamandyr (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers50,139 edits →Edit warring: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| ] Please do not add or change content without citing a ]. Please review the guidelines at ] and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-unsourced2 --> ] (]) 10:07, 11 June 2015 (UTC) | ] Please do not add or change content without citing a ]. Please review the guidelines at ] and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-unsourced2 --> ] (]) 10:07, 11 June 2015 (UTC) | ||
| == Edit warring == | |||
| {{3rr}} This is user:RMkop logged out and said editor has been notified of edit warring. --] (]) 16:00, 26 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:00, 26 June 2015
Editor of the week
Much as I appreciate the thought, I'm not eligible for an EoW award; admins are not considered. I've therefore removed your nomination, but thank you nevertheless. Yunshui 水 12:40, 25 February 2015 (UTC) Okay, but you deserve it, admin or not :) 2A03:2880:3010:6FF2:FACE:B00C:0:1 (talk) 13:59, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
May 2015
Hello, I'm Winner 42. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to World Naked Bike Ride— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Winner 42 Talk to me! 19:59, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Misplaced Pages:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 10:07, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
Edit warring
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. This is user:RMkop logged out and said editor has been notified of edit warring. --Kansas Bear (talk) 16:00, 26 June 2015 (UTC)