Revision as of 16:01, 28 June 2015 editBeeblebrox (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators113,596 edits yawn← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:11, 30 June 2015 edit undoKnowledgekid87 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers96,775 edits NewNext edit → | ||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
Renew PC? --] (]) 20:01, 19 June 2015 (UTC) | Renew PC? --] (]) 20:01, 19 June 2015 (UTC) | ||
:It does seem to be working, but normally we don't protect preemptively and it hasn't even expired yet. ] (]) 21:33, 19 June 2015 (UTC) | :It does seem to be working, but normally we don't protect preemptively and it hasn't even expired yet. ] (]) 21:33, 19 June 2015 (UTC) | ||
== Insightful == | |||
I found your essay ] very insightful, it really does feel like you are dealing with an unmovable brick wall. In my view yes good editors should deserve respect and be admired but when you have those same editors act up its hard. Maybe its a cultural thing for some, but I believe that basic respect should be given to everyone. - ] (]) 02:11, 30 June 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:11, 30 June 2015
Welcome to my talk page
I prefer to keep conversations in one place in order to make it easier to follow them. Therefore, if I have begun a conversation with you elsewhere, that is where I would prefer you reply and is probably where I will reply to you.
I am an oversighter, but it is generally inadvisable to discuss oversight matters on-wiki. If you need to request oversight, following the process at WP:RFO is the best route to getting your request handled in a timely fashion, but you can email me if you prefer.
Do you actually want to be blocked? I'll consider your request iff you meet my criteria, Click here to see them.
LGBT rights in ISIL-controlled territory
Hello! I was a major contributor of sourced, appropriate content to the aforementioned article. While I realize the page's creator was blocked (presumably for unrelated reasons), the article itself was worthwhile and had been up in its most recent incarnation for several months. Could you possibly restore it, or perhaps give me the article's body so I can recreate it?
Thanks! 3hunna (talk) 05:56, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
- I see from the edit history that there is some dispute over whether this shouldn't just redirect to the article on human rights in their territory. As this is a fairly brief article I tend to agree, but I don't really intend to get involved editorially here, so I'm going to re-create the article as a redirect, but with the page history intact so it can be used as well. Beeblebrox (talk) 03:23, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Awesome. 3hunna (talk) 02:11, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
Move List of census-designated places in West Virginia
Hello Beeblebrox, can you move List of census-designated places in West Virginia to List of census designated places in West Virginia? Our article goes by census designated place, not census-designated place. I would move it myself, but List of census designated places in West Virginia redirects to List of census-designated places in West Virginia. Thanks. Seattle (talk) 00:18, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
- Moved, nevermind. Seattle (talk) 00:20, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
Anchorage, Alaska
Renew PC? --George Ho (talk) 20:01, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
- It does seem to be working, but normally we don't protect preemptively and it hasn't even expired yet. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:33, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Insightful
I found your essay Misplaced Pages:Unblockable very insightful, it really does feel like you are dealing with an unmovable brick wall. In my view yes good editors should deserve respect and be admired but when you have those same editors act up its hard. Maybe its a cultural thing for some, but I believe that basic respect should be given to everyone. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 02:11, 30 June 2015 (UTC)