Revision as of 21:37, 24 April 2014 editDevelopmentalcognitive (talk | contribs)432 edits add cat← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:19, 30 July 2015 edit undo128.103.224.4 (talk) List of names is not appropriateNext edit → | ||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Reason for the change – developmental cognitive neuroscience, as is obvious by its name – is at the intersection of 3 fields. It is okay to include social neuroscience, but that was a later addition and is not part of the core concept. Moreover, if social neuroscience is added then affective (emotional) neuroscience should definitely be added as well. Importantly, no definition of developmental cognitive neuroscience was offered. ] (]) 18:28, 2 April 2014 (UTC) | Reason for the change – developmental cognitive neuroscience, as is obvious by its name – is at the intersection of 3 fields. It is okay to include social neuroscience, but that was a later addition and is not part of the core concept. Moreover, if social neuroscience is added then affective (emotional) neuroscience should definitely be added as well. Importantly, no definition of developmental cognitive neuroscience was offered. ] (]) 18:28, 2 April 2014 (UTC) | ||
----- | |||
The list of names seems incomplete and biased toward only a few research groups and topics. Where did the list come from? It does not seem objective, or particularly useful in explicating the topic. |
Revision as of 13:19, 30 July 2015
Psychology Start‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Neuroscience Start‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||
|
First two paragraphs
Reason for the change – developmental cognitive neuroscience, as is obvious by its name – is at the intersection of 3 fields. It is okay to include social neuroscience, but that was a later addition and is not part of the core concept. Moreover, if social neuroscience is added then affective (emotional) neuroscience should definitely be added as well. Importantly, no definition of developmental cognitive neuroscience was offered. Developmentalcognitive (talk) 18:28, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
The list of names seems incomplete and biased toward only a few research groups and topics. Where did the list come from? It does not seem objective, or particularly useful in explicating the topic.
Categories: