| Revision as of 19:17, 3 August 2006 editSplash (talk | contribs)33,425 edits blank - sock← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:54, 3 August 2006 edit undoWknight94 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users89,452 edits So why does that mean his entire talk page gets blanked?!Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| '''Welcome!''' | |||
| This user is a sockpuppet as described on the user page. -] - ] 19:17, 3 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Hello, {{BASEPAGENAME}}, and ] to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| I hope you enjoy editing here and being a ]! Please ] on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out ], ask me on my talk page, or place <code>{{helpme}}</code> on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! —] (]) 15:59, 3 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Speedy retagging== | |||
| Regarding ], I previously removed a speedy deletion tag you added but you re-added so I re-removed. That article just survived an AFD so it is not a candidate for speedy deletion. Please stop re-adding the speedy tag. Thanks. —] (]) 15:59, 3 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :I think the ] should be deleted. Did I do something wrong? It also seems to be a reason ] says I am a sockpuppet of ], something it looks like he does when people do not agree with him. I made a request on the ] page that he gets looked at. Can you advise me further? ] 16:04, 3 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::That article has already been nominated for non-speedy deletion and it survived. If it is not a candidate for ''non-speedy'' deletion, it certainly isn't a candidate for ''speedy'' deletion. That's an honest mistake. The problem is that I removed the speedy tag yesterday with an edit summary and you re-added the tag today. Once an admin removes a speedy deletion tag, you're not supposed to re-add it. Bring it to ] or ] if you want but I already said that it's not a candidate for ]. As far as the sockpuppet accusations, I don't know anything about that. —] (]) 16:09, 3 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::I now have the ] page. I think I must have misread the deletion thing before. Thank you for your help. ] 16:15, 3 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Not a problem. Speedy deletion can be a little dangerous if administrators get careless and don't look into the history of an article before hitting the deletion button. I've had to save a couple articles recently that were speedy deleted by admins who didn't notice that the article had been badly vandalized first. Vandals using speedy delete is very bad because it's hard to track down what they've had deleted. Sorry if I'm a little touchy about it! :) —] (]) 16:23, 3 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Hey, thanks for helping me combat CFIF's recklessness in labeling others sockpuppets. It's comforting to know I'm not the only one being targeted. ] 17:00, 3 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:54, 3 August 2006
Welcome!
Hello, José is Fluid, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! —Wknight94 (talk) 15:59, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
Speedy retagging
Regarding Don Bell (reporter), I previously removed a speedy deletion tag you added but you re-added so I re-removed. That article just survived an AFD so it is not a candidate for speedy deletion. Please stop re-adding the speedy tag. Thanks. —Wknight94 (talk) 15:59, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
- I think the Don Bell (reporter) should be deleted. Did I do something wrong? It also seems to be a reason User:CFIF says I am a sockpuppet of User:Spotteddogsdotorg, something it looks like he does when people do not agree with him. I made a request on the Misplaced Pages:Requests for investigation page that he gets looked at. Can you advise me further? José is Fluid 16:04, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
- That article has already been nominated for non-speedy deletion and it survived. If it is not a candidate for non-speedy deletion, it certainly isn't a candidate for speedy deletion. That's an honest mistake. The problem is that I removed the speedy tag yesterday with an edit summary and you re-added the tag today. Once an admin removes a speedy deletion tag, you're not supposed to re-add it. Bring it to WP:PROD or WP:AFD if you want but I already said that it's not a candidate for WP:CSD. As far as the sockpuppet accusations, I don't know anything about that. —Wknight94 (talk) 16:09, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
- I now have the Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Don Bell (reporter) page. I think I must have misread the deletion thing before. Thank you for your help. José is Fluid 16:15, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
- Not a problem. Speedy deletion can be a little dangerous if administrators get careless and don't look into the history of an article before hitting the deletion button. I've had to save a couple articles recently that were speedy deleted by admins who didn't notice that the article had been badly vandalized first. Vandals using speedy delete is very bad because it's hard to track down what they've had deleted. Sorry if I'm a little touchy about it! :) —Wknight94 (talk) 16:23, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
- I now have the Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Don Bell (reporter) page. I think I must have misread the deletion thing before. Thank you for your help. José is Fluid 16:15, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
- That article has already been nominated for non-speedy deletion and it survived. If it is not a candidate for non-speedy deletion, it certainly isn't a candidate for speedy deletion. That's an honest mistake. The problem is that I removed the speedy tag yesterday with an edit summary and you re-added the tag today. Once an admin removes a speedy deletion tag, you're not supposed to re-add it. Bring it to WP:PROD or WP:AFD if you want but I already said that it's not a candidate for WP:CSD. As far as the sockpuppet accusations, I don't know anything about that. —Wknight94 (talk) 16:09, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
User:CFIF
Hey, thanks for helping me combat CFIF's recklessness in labeling others sockpuppets. It's comforting to know I'm not the only one being targeted. JianLi 17:00, 3 August 2006 (UTC)