| Revision as of 20:07, 10 August 2015 editSammy1339 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,929 edits →Mattress performance← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:20, 10 August 2015 edit undoA21sauce (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers23,752 edits →Mattress performance: responseNext edit → | ||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
| Hi, the boys have put in a ] quote, lengthening the section on responses. Will you put your two cents on the Talk page when you have a chance?--] (]) 19:34, 10 August 2015 (UTC) | Hi, the boys have put in a ] quote, lengthening the section on responses. Will you put your two cents on the Talk page when you have a chance?--] (]) 19:34, 10 August 2015 (UTC) | ||
| :Just one boy. I for the record had nothing to do with that and can't vouch for the content. I merely commented that the stated reasons for ]'s revert seemed flimsy. --] (]) 20:07, 10 August 2015 (UTC) | :Just one boy. I for the record had nothing to do with that and can't vouch for the content. I merely commented that the stated reasons for ]'s revert seemed flimsy. --] (]) 20:07, 10 August 2015 (UTC) | ||
| ::The editors chiming in are guys. Also, lengthening the article is a flimsy reason? Right.--] (]) 20:20, 10 August 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:20, 10 August 2015
|
 |
|---|
| 24 December 2024 |
|
2015: Jan · Feb · Mar · Apr · May · Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov · Dec
Death of Ian Tomlinson
hello. You are wp:editwarring on Death of Ian Tomlinson Govindaharihari (talk) 19:44, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
Gladsmuir
I asked and was given permission to stand on the front lawn of Gladsmuir. There is still a car but there was nothing I could do about that. Philafrenzy (talk) 21:04, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Philafrenzy, I'm just being super cautious. I'm sure it's fine, especially if you had permission. I've been looking through your photographs of the whole area. They're really wonderful. I've driven through it a few times, but never stopped to look carefully. Sarah 21:19, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
- I wrote that before I saw your new photograph. It's great, thank you! Sarah 21:22, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
- Actually, Phil, if you live near there and have spoken to the owners (and so long as they know it's for Misplaced Pages), I wonder whether they would ever let you take photographs inside, or at the back. There are apparently some interesting features, including a weather vane from 1775. Sarah 21:26, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
- I got permission from the security man. I think they have had photographers before. I regret to say that I doubt I would get permission to go inside or round the back. With full time security and lots of cameras I think they guard their privacy very carefully. I was surprised really that I was allowed to take that shot. Every other house in MH is listed or has an interesting history. Not so Hadley Wood, however, which is stockbroker and footballer territory with barely a shred of history. Philafrenzy (talk) 21:34, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, that makes sense, and asking would feel awkward. Sarah 21:39, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
- The answer with these houses is to wait until they put it up for sale and make sure you capture all the inside shots from the estate agent's listing using Internet Archive or a similar service. Those links can then be incorporated into the article. Lowbridge Estate and Hadley Lodge for instance. Philafrenzy (talk) 21:52, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
- I got permission from the security man. I think they have had photographers before. I regret to say that I doubt I would get permission to go inside or round the back. With full time security and lots of cameras I think they guard their privacy very carefully. I was surprised really that I was allowed to take that shot. Every other house in MH is listed or has an interesting history. Not so Hadley Wood, however, which is stockbroker and footballer territory with barely a shred of history. Philafrenzy (talk) 21:34, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
- Actually, Phil, if you live near there and have spoken to the owners (and so long as they know it's for Misplaced Pages), I wonder whether they would ever let you take photographs inside, or at the back. There are apparently some interesting features, including a weather vane from 1775. Sarah 21:26, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
Female mentorship
Nice to see you have time to work on that article, question though. You added sources but a large amount of the promotionialism is still in the article. Do you have plans on copy editing or getting people to work on the article? I am loathe to do it as it might require a female touch but I still think it is needing a rewrite. I'm willing to hold off on that if you are still working on the article. Let me know please and i will respect the fact if you are planning on working on it and leave it be. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 12:54, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
- It's more or less back to a stub now, so perhaps familiar with it will build it up again. Sarah 17:48, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Core content policy talk
Template:Core content policy talk has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:33, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Controversial groups
Template:Controversial groups has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:47, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
Mattress performance
Hi, the boys have put in a Camille Paglia quote, lengthening the section on responses. Will you put your two cents on the Talk page when you have a chance?--A21sauce (talk) 19:34, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
- Just one boy. I for the record had nothing to do with that and can't vouch for the content. I merely commented that the stated reasons for A21sauce's revert seemed flimsy. --Sammy1339 (talk) 20:07, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
- The editors chiming in are guys. Also, lengthening the article is a flimsy reason? Right.--A21sauce (talk) 20:20, 10 August 2015 (UTC)