Revision as of 05:01, 12 August 2015 editConifer (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers12,669 edits Notifying author of deletion nomination for FreeWorldGroup | Revision as of 05:24, 12 August 2015 edit undoConifer (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers12,669 edits →Explanation of notability: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Thanks, ] (]) 05:01, 12 August 2015 (UTC) | Thanks, ] (]) 05:01, 12 August 2015 (UTC) | ||
== Explanation of notability == | |||
To include an article about a company on Misplaced Pages, there have to be ]. That means newspaper articles or books. LinkedIn doesn't qualify because except in rare circumstances, social media websites are not ], and neither that nor references written by the owner are independent of the company. ] (]) 05:24, 12 August 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:24, 12 August 2015
Deletion discussion about FreeWorldGroup
Hello, Flobberz,
I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether FreeWorldGroup should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/FreeWorldGroup .
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Thanks, Conifer (talk) 05:01, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
Explanation of notability
To include an article about a company on Misplaced Pages, there have to be multiple reliable, independent sources that have written about the company. That means newspaper articles or books. LinkedIn doesn't qualify because except in rare circumstances, social media websites are not reliable sources, and neither that nor references written by the owner are independent of the company. Conifer (talk) 05:24, 12 August 2015 (UTC)