| Revision as of 02:05, 17 August 2015 editMONGO (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers76,644 edits →Arbcom arbitration enforcement: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:55, 17 August 2015 edit undoDHeyward (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers18,753 edits →Arbcom arbitration enforcementNext edit → | ||
| Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
| Doesn't look like your comments there are getting much traction. This is the worst committee this site has ever promoted, so the last thing I would expect from them is sanity.--] 02:05, 17 August 2015 (UTC) | Doesn't look like your comments there are getting much traction. This is the worst committee this site has ever promoted, so the last thing I would expect from them is sanity.--] 02:05, 17 August 2015 (UTC) | ||
| :It's weird because they pretty much adopted my workshop verbatim except for the "no action is an action" which is silly because its not logged. My AE case had an admin bring up a 7 month edit as a 1RR vio. Imagine the chaos of an unlogged "no action." Any action will be wikilawyered as undoing a previous "no action." It just means more drama. I have no horse in the race. The real issue is "involved." Look at the last minor edit I made to signpost that was reverted. Then ask how 2 gamergate admins and gg spa are in an edit war at "My Little pony" article. Idiocy. Too many partisan crackpots. --] (]) 04:55, 17 August 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:55, 17 August 2015
- /Archive 1 Created May 1. 2006
- /Archive 2 Created August 24, 2006
- /Archive 3 Created September 30, 2006
- /Archive 4 Created November 19, 2006
- /Archive 5 Created 05:43, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- /Archive 6 Created 15:22, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
- /Archive 7 Created 04:36, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
- /Archive 08 Created 01:32, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
- /Archive 09 Created 05:30, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
- /Archive 10 Created --DHeyward (talk) 08:03, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
- /Archive 11 created --DHeyward (talk) 03:43, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
- /Archive 12 created --DHeyward (talk) 09:09, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
- /Archive 13
- /Archive 14
- /Archive 15
- /Archive 16
- /Archive 17
Friday 10 January05:56 UTC
Please add comments to the bottom
UTRS Account Request
I confirm that I have requested an account on the UTRS tool. DHeyward (talk)
American Sniper
Would you care to explain your rationale behind your edit at American Sniper (film) in more detail? Describing how a biographical or autobiographical work differs from true events falls well within our boundaries as an encyclopedia. Noting that key scenes in the film are fictional doesn't place "undue weight" on anything; we are describing reality. Some guy (talk) 00:51, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
- I tried to start a discussion with you and instead you deleted more sourced content. I will treat further deletions as vandalism if you refrain from discussing the subject. Some guy (talk) 02:26, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
Cecil
Please be mindful of 3RR on Cecil. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 14:51, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
@Nomoskedasticity: Did I revert? diff? Not intentional if I even did one..--DHeyward (talk) 14:56, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
- Nomoskedasticity did you actually come here to tell me to be mindful when I have no reverts and you just reverted me to an arguable BLP violation? I'll bring it to talk page but if we can describe a thing without "allegedly", we do. --DHeyward (talk) 15:04, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
GamerGate AfD notice
Hi! I'm leaving you this note because you recently particpated in a discussion that resulted in a deletion request which you may be interested in. NickCT (talk) 14:41, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
Statistics
Hey, DH. I spent two years of undergraduate school and two years of graduate school doing statistical analysis in an econometric context. When I saw the graph plotting the trends, I had exactly the same reaction as you: only the trend lines for the percentages matter, not the raw numbers . Glad to see someone has a grasp of math and stats around here. Cheers. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 23:41, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
Arbcom arbitration enforcement
Doesn't look like your comments there are getting much traction. This is the worst committee this site has ever promoted, so the last thing I would expect from them is sanity.--MONGO 02:05, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
- It's weird because they pretty much adopted my workshop verbatim except for the "no action is an action" which is silly because its not logged. My AE case had an admin bring up a 7 month edit as a 1RR vio. Imagine the chaos of an unlogged "no action." Any action will be wikilawyered as undoing a previous "no action." It just means more drama. I have no horse in the race. The real issue is "involved." Look at the last minor edit I made to signpost that was reverted. Then ask how 2 gamergate admins and gg spa are in an edit war at "My Little pony" article. Idiocy. Too many partisan crackpots. --DHeyward (talk) 04:55, 17 August 2015 (UTC)