| Revision as of 13:53, 31 August 2015 editSandyGeorgia (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Mass message senders, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors279,025 edits →TS: add← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:56, 31 August 2015 edit undoMahfuzur rahman shourov (talk | contribs)594 edits →do not remove entire sections from talk pages: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 100: | Line 100: | ||
| == TS == | == TS == | ||
| Hey, Doc! Why'd you make that change at ]? The narrative no longer flows or makes sense ... is there a MEDMOS change I should know about ? I will now need to restructure all of the text to recover a narrative that makes sense. To talk about TS, you have to first understand what a tic is, and to understand TS, you have to position it on the spectrum of tic disorders, which also requires first a basic definition of a tic. Could we please return to the narrative that was reviewed at FAC? Best, ] (]) 13:46, 31 August 2015 (UTC) | Hey, Doc! Why'd you make that change at ]? The narrative no longer flows or makes sense ... is there a MEDMOS change I should know about ? I will now need to restructure all of the text to recover a narrative that makes sense. To talk about TS, you have to first understand what a tic is, and to understand TS, you have to position it on the spectrum of tic disorders, which also requires first a basic definition of a tic. Could we please return to the narrative that was reviewed at FAC? Best, ] (]) 13:46, 31 August 2015 (UTC) | ||
| == do not remove entire sections from talk pages == | |||
| while reverting priority changes, please do not remove new sections from the talk pages of the articles as they can provide topics and insights which are worth the discussion over them. | |||
Revision as of 15:56, 31 August 2015
| Translation Main page | Those Involved (sign up) | Newsletter |
Cochrane Collaboration meeting in Vienna, October 1stHi Doc James, I 've heard you might be able to visit the Cochrane Collaboration meeting in Vienna. Somebody (User:FloNight?) reserved some time for a wikipedian pre-colloquium . We've skyped with FloNight about this recently, and several people would like to attend, but we need some details. Are you, or ia FloNight planning to give a speech, a workshop, or anything else? Do you want us to prepare something? What will be our objective? Please answer on our wikiproject's subpage, English is OK. - Or, if I'm completely wrong, please forward this to whom it may concern. Regards, --MBq (talk) 08:56, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
FILWISEFILWISE (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) has edited a number of medical articles without adding sources. I see you warned FILWISE in 2013 more than a few times. Some of the added info seems rather dubious. Such as "runny nose" being a symptom of smallpox. I don't see runny nose in the source. I have looked at a number of FILWISE's edits and have yet to find one where a source is added. The edits are quite wide-ranging and I would be quite surprised if FILWISE is that competent in all those areas. Sometimes it seems that the edits are a simple rehash of material in the current article such as this. I suspect wp:competence. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 10:48, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
Category:RTTI think Category:RTT should have a link to some page with an explanation of the purpose of the category, or text outlining the purpose. Otherwise people will be puzzled and/or want to remove it. Or, like me, they'll come here! Johnuniq (talk) 00:13, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
Sorry to make all this noise, but there is a technical problem of some kind at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Medicine/Translation task force/RTT(Simplified). I thought I might be able to fix it, but the html is above my pay grade. The issue is that Template:TTF tabs is putting a heading and logo at the top, but that is obscuring the navigation links—when logged on in Firefox, the edit and history buttons are hidden, and when not logged on, other bad things happen. That's probably due to "margin-top: -120px" but someone at WP:VPT should be asked to fix it. It seems to work in Internet Explorer. It's trivia but it should be fixed. If wanted, I'll ask at WP:VPT. Johnuniq (talk) 00:47, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 August 2015
Type-2 pericytes participate in normal and tumoral angiogenesisIf you search you'll see it's placed around as a citation, is it legit? I ask as a spam IP is posting it everywhere. I'll likely have reported them in minutes, but wondered if the rest should be removed? Jerod Lycett (talk) 04:15, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:40, 28 August 2015 (UTC) Hi Doc JamesI figured that website would be a good reference for https://en.wikipedia.org/Mercaptopurine because Dr. Bressler is my gastroenterologist. He wrote the article https://www.trustedtherapies.com/articles/29-imuran-azathioprine-and-6-mp-6-mercaptopurine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by YuleMyOwnBalk (talk • contribs) 21:40, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
Email heading your wayIt's a bit time sensitive. Hope you're in a position to respond. Thanks! Risker (talk) 20:34, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
olanzapine articleCan you please just link it to the article about suicidal ideation without trying to rephrase it? Suicidal ideation is not the same as suicidal or thinking too much about suicide. Suicidal thoughts = considering suicide. Suicidal ideation = not necessarily suicidal, but preoccupied with suicide and especially suicide scenarios. Thus the "ideation." We don't need to dumb this down, anyone reading the article about olanzapine should be capable of knowing what suicidal ideation is or can click on the link to read more. Otherwise it needs to be clear that the side effect is not feeling suicidal or suicidal thoughts (if you're a doctor you should know that "Have you had suicidal thoughts?" is a key question.) —Мандичка 😜 21:43, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
TeflonDid you read the article. I think the testing that was done for the lawsuits against DuPont and DuPont's documented internal testing are quite convincing. Must the source come from a legal journal? Does it need to be peer reviewed? I'm new to Misplaced Pages editing, would you provide some guidance to me? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wedgwoodblue (talk • contribs) 02:24, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
TSHey, Doc! Why'd you make that change at Tourette syndrome? The narrative no longer flows or makes sense ... is there a MEDMOS change I should know about ? I will now need to restructure all of the text to recover a narrative that makes sense. To talk about TS, you have to first understand what a tic is, and to understand TS, you have to position it on the spectrum of tic disorders, which also requires first a basic definition of a tic. Could we please return to the narrative that was reviewed at FAC? Best, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 13:46, 31 August 2015 (UTC) do not remove entire sections from talk pageswhile reverting priority changes, please do not remove new sections from the talk pages of the articles as they can provide topics and insights which are worth the discussion over them. |
