| Revision as of 01:02, 1 September 2015 editAnomieBOT (talk | contribs)Bots6,574,388 editsm Substing templates: {{uw-disrupt4}}. See User:AnomieBOT/docs/TemplateSubster for info.← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:19, 1 September 2015 edit undoRenamed user mou89p43twvqcvm8ut9w3 (talk | contribs)90,395 edits Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Foot fetishism. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| ] Hello, I'm ]. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of ] —the one you made with <span class="plainlinks"></span> to ]— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on ]. Thanks. <!-- Template:Huggle/warn-1 --><!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 -->] (]) 00:54, 1 September 2015 (UTC) | ] Hello, I'm ]. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of ] —the one you made with <span class="plainlinks"></span> to ]— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on ]. Thanks. <!-- Template:Huggle/warn-1 --><!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 -->] (]) 00:54, 1 September 2015 (UTC) | ||
| :''If this is a ], and you did not make the edits, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | |||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ~ <b>]</b><sup>]</sup> 01:19, 1 September 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :''If this is a ], and you did not make the edits, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | :''If this is a ], and you did not make the edits, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | ||
Revision as of 01:19, 1 September 2015
English required
Hello. Could you please stop editing here, and instead edit the Misplaced Pages of your native language? Your edits are harmful. KateWishing (talk) 23:48, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Warning
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Misplaced Pages. KateWishing (talk) 00:31, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
September 2015
Hello, I'm CyberWarfare. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Shoe fetishism— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. --CyberWarfare (talk) 00:54, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Your recent editing history at Foot fetishism shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ~ Rob 01:19, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.