Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 16:15, 1 September 2015

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

Hello! Krystaleen, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse, an awesome place to meet people, ask questions, and learn more about Misplaced Pages. Please join us! Rosiestep (talk) 02:41, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Changes

	Changes
	Why did you change my changes on Brian littrell for especially on his heart surgery I added more information and that's why people go to Misplaced Pages for INFORMATION now I ain't gonna swear cause I might get told off by you, k so I just want to know why you changed the information. BSBNKOTB5IVEfan (talk) 18:47, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Your writing style is very unencyclopedic, use last name instead of first name. Your addition was unsourced, if you rewrite that paragraph and add a reliable source to back it up, it would be fine.--Krystaleen 03:32, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

ok can you tell me or help me i don't know what sources i would need to use. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BSBNKOTB5IVEfan (talk • contribs) 17:10, 19 May 2013 (UTC) Can you help me please? How do I write something that is encyclopedic without you changing it. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BSBNKOTB5IVEfan (talk • contribs) 18:12, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

You should read around, there are a lot of guides in wikipedia. Misplaced Pages:REF for starters, and on the right hand side of that page there are links to a lot of other basic wikipedia guides.--Krystaleen 02:49, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Edit warring?

I replaced a reference that was a dead link and added two sources. I then switched their places and that's where you come in and revert me for the sake of reverting. That by definition is disruption and will be reported if you choose to make a of it 69.165.246.181 (talk) 03:27, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

• How will me creating an account improve/justify your recent edits on that article? 69.165.246.181 (talk) 03:48, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

I've fixed the dead link and it's now a working link. The sources I provided, both of them, are sufficient, and support the statement adequately. The source you posted, that Uncoverdiscover.com one is unreliable, and you posted bare links as references instead of filling all the titles, article dates, author, etc properly. Your edits are disrupting and you're about to violate WP:3RR policy. Actually it looks like you may have.--Krystaleen 04:12, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Um no I'm the one who removed the dead link (see my edit summary there). If you've added a source relevant to the statement and directly supporting it, that's all i care about. I switched the sides of the previous sources that I added cuz the Washington times article was directly verifying the statement. 69.165.246.181 (talk) 05:09, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Nope, I fixed the link, if you've bothered to check. And both of my sources do directly support the statement, yes even the first one, if you bothered to actually read the article.--Krystaleen 05:27, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

"Crawling Back" image

Yeah, that's pretty clearly a fake; thanks for pointing it out. It's gone now. DS (talk) 23:29, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Nick & Knight (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Charleston, Phoenix, Vogue, Trocadero, Orpheum, Civic Theatre and Center Stage

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Sovereign

You can listen to the album on iTunes radio.HotHat (talk) 04:20, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Exo

Hi! from an editorial point of view it is not our job to announce if kris has left or not. The press conference said NOTHING about Kris not being an official member of the band anymore. The press conf merely announced that for the time being, since they are unable to contact Kris, the band will promote with 11 members. SM has NOT announced that he is no longer a band member. We cannot make conclusions on our own, we can only write what the sources write. And the sources DO NOT say his no longer an official member. Technically as long as the court decides otherwise, his contract remains valid. when Kris or his lawyer will release a statement that Kris no longer considers himself Exo, we can cite that. It's too early in the procedure for us to draw conclusions. It's not Misplaced Pages's job to draw conclusions. You can cite what the source says, NOTHING ELSE. Teemeah 14:55, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

They didn't exactly say "for the time being" did they? I don't know I think it's pretty clear he's left.--Krystaleen 16:27, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Exo no longer promotes with 11 members. Ever since Luhan left on the 10th October, Exo promotes with 10 members. Therefore, to claim as of the submission date Exo promotes with 11 members is misleading.

No it is accurate. Nowhere does it say that currently they promote with 11 members, only that as of the lawsuit date they promoted with 11 members.--Krystaleen 09:22, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

"On May 15, 2014, S.M. Entertainment confirmed through an interview that EXO-M's leader, Kris, had filed a lawsuit against the agency to terminate his contract. as of the submission date of the lawsuit the band promotes with 11 members." To say that as of the submission date Exo promotes with 11 members implies they have been promoting with 11 members from the 15th May 2014 until now, especially since no similar sentence was inserted after stating Luhan has filed his lawsuit. The second sentence as it is may not be incorrect but it is misleading and confusing.

Uh no that's not what "as of" means. Now if you want to add the info that as of now they promote with 10 members you can do so but you must add a reliable source. Also you can't say "currently" because it's not encyclopedic. https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style#Current--Krystaleen 16:46, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

I would prefer to delete that sentence rather than add another similar one after Luhan. Would you object to that?

No, go ahead. Other editors might have a problem though, I'm not sure. Oh and please sign your posts on talk pages.--Krystaleen 00:38, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

EXO

Since when is a Wordpress fan blog an acceptable source? Teemeah 16:48, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

I was just reverting the unconstructive edits. You're right the Wordpress isn't a reliable source and thus has to be removed.--Krystaleen 16:56, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Lauren Daigle

Hi Krystal. I declined your speedy deletion nomination of the above article, because there were credible claims of notability for this particular singer, particularly based on the Billboard sources, not to mention a few other reliable sources. The subject is also likely to be notable, IMO. In practice, I generally only do speedy deletion nominations for articles that lack sources, or rely exclusively on non-independent ones. Otherwise it's better to send articles with questionable sourcing to AfD. Thanks, I, JethroBT 07:36, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Okay, but the sources seem pretty trivial to me. The only notable sources that actually talk about her is the biography one and the billboard one. The others only mention her in passing, or about EPs or songs she features in as a background vocalist.--Krystaleen 08:26, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Your old comment on Exo's article

Hi. I just noticed the comment you left about a month ago on the talk page of the Exo article. It was about how you feel use of the term "comeback" on kpop articles is not good. The Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Korea/Popular culture works on kpop articles, and editors would love to hear your point of view. Kpop articles have a real problem with being too tailored to suit the desires just of hardcore kpop fans. Feel free to leave a message on the talk page of the page I linked! :) Shinyang-i (talk) 10:12, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Backstreet Boys Doc Movie Poster.jpeg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Backstreet Boys Doc Movie Poster.jpeg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Misplaced Pages is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:48, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Cinderella Special Edition OST.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cinderella Special Edition OST.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:52, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Newsies Original Broadway Cast Recording.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Newsies Original Broadway Cast Recording.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:50, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

File:In a World Like This (Deluxe World Tour Edition).jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:In a World Like This (Deluxe World Tour Edition).jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:27, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Re: In a World Like This Tour

I do not appreciate being told I'm doing something wrong when I am not. Like you, I'm just trying to provide accurate information. If you read the edit history, you will see that my edits DO provide an explanation/summary.

• (cur | prev) 05:56, 25 May 2015‎ 50.155.157.164 (talk)‎ . . (57,097 bytes) (+519)‎ . . (source for perth opening act) (undo)
• (cur | prev) 05:44, 25 May 2015‎ 50.155.157.164 (talk)‎ . . (56,578 bytes) (-2,336)‎ . . (there is a reason why the city/venue is specified, start a blog if you a want show by show setlist) (undo)

However, you CHOSE to blindly revert edits because they do not agree with how you want this article to be displayed. I am doing nothing short of reiterating to you things that were told to me by other editors and admins. You have been warned of this in the past. If you CHOSE to actively continue this behavior. I will direct this to the attention of the admins.50.155.157.164 (talk) 05:15, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

You can't remove sourced content and replace it with something else, and not provide a source. The set list is fully backed by a source so I don't know why you keep removing that. Second, the rest of the opening acts are sorted chronologically, not alphabetically so I don't know why you keep putting the opening acts for Australians dates which is in May up there. Third, the cities/shows are properly cited from their official site backstreetboys.com/events and it's listed there as Recife so if you think their official site is wrong please provide a source.--Krystaleen 12:10, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

IAWLTT Band

Hello, wanted to ask you a question. In the In a World Like This Tour article, there is a list of the group members and the instruments they play. There seems to be confusion with this. Many of the articles I've read indicate there is no live band for this tour. Maybe it needs to be reworded but are you inferring the group is also the band?Itsbydesign (talk) 05:57, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Yes the group members play instruments but only during the acoustic session. As written on the paragraph: "Typically a show of this tour consists of 22–23 songs, including an acoustic set of 4–5 songs during which the group members play instruments." Hopefully that's clear enough.--Krystaleen 06:01, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hymns (Michael W. Smith album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Victory in Jesus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Disney Tsum Tsum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 101 Dalmatians (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Theres a Mistake you need to take in consideration

This text above is the original content exist from the started ( at least 2/1 uears ago ) , the only part i add are about tremendous records in Asia and the best selling foreign artist in Japan . Thats all .

how do you explain and removed a big part of Original content ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by MugenDarkness (talk • contribs)

First, please sign your posts as explained here WP:SIGN. Second, I already stated why on the comments: because they're fancruft and gives an undue weight to the group in question. There's no need to write such a detailed paragraph for a single group because this article is about boy bands in general not just one specific boy band.--Krystaleen 14:59, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

youre wrong about ;

1. The title - the original title stated the other boyband and TVXQ ( South Korean boyband ) is included in the title

2. You deleted the title

3. The new article stated TVXQ had a success all over Asia but theres no legit source in that ,

4. I stated TVXQ had a massive success all over Asia and The Group is the best selling foreign artist in Japan and put a directed ( legit ) proof to that .

so how do you explain ? You did not put any source and change a big part of original content ( you change the original Title as well ) and all i did is put a source to support the original text — Preceding unsigned comment added by MugenDarkness (talk • contribs) 15:18, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Yes I did change the title as TVXQ was never that big to begin with. The title is reserved for boy bands who are iconic to the decade in question. For example, Backstreet Boys is mentioned in the title because obviously they're the biggest boy band in the world in the early 2000s. Westlife is very big in Europe and Asia. Jonas Brothers was the biggest boy band of the "new" generation, as in late 2000s. And F4 is the only Asian boy band who ever blew up big, on par with BSB/Westlife popularity in Asia. That's why those 4 boy bands are in the title. And like I mentioned earlier,there's no need to mention a single group's achievement, unless it's very significant. Also you need to provide a source that support the statement that TVXQ was big all over Asia. Or if you can't find a source you can remove the statement.--Krystaleen 15:25, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Ok there youre are being bias here ,

how do you explain The original title remain the same over the past years until you changed it based on your bias logic

and what about F4 ? They are nothing compare to TVXQ , you better dont pull a joke here

how do i proof TVXQ is big all over Asia ? **** i put a link in first place to support the statements and you said yourselvee that this is not where one should wrote an essay

TVXQ is among the Top 30 significant boyband in history

http:/top40.about.com/od/Performers/ss/Top-30-Boy-Bands-Of-All-Time-A-History.htm — Preceding unsigned comment added by MugenDarkness (talk • contribs) 15:51, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

That site is not reliable. Now if you were around in the early 2000s you'd know how big F4 was. They were virtually inescapable in Asia. TVXQ never reached their level of popularity. Now Super Junior's popularity was maybe closer to F4's. Please use this guide WP:NOENG on how to properly cite non-English articles.--Krystaleen 16:06, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Youre the most retard editor o had ever meet , i actually put a link for sake and support the statements and you want to doubt it baaed on your own " experience " , are hella joking ??

Your are bias here obviously

and you are not respomd to my questioned yet , hpw the gell the title remained the same over the past years ? Are you sayong other editor did not do their work ?

F4 ? Are ya Joking ? How do you prove they are big in Asia ? Bullshit ?

TVXQ attracted 393,000 attendance across Asia alone in 2008 . F4 ? BULLSHIT