| Revision as of 15:36, 6 September 2015 editAcroterion (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators232,827 editsm Reverted edits by ABHJ (Always Be Heiling Jimbo) (talk) to last version by MONGO← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:02, 6 September 2015 edit undoNyttend backup (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers4,507 edits →Block needed, and I'm involved: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
| ... for the speedy deletion. If you have a sec, can you also look at ... ], ], ], ], ], ], ]? ] (]) 23:39, 4 September 2015 (UTC) | ... for the speedy deletion. If you have a sec, can you also look at ... ], ], ], ], ], ], ]? ] (]) 23:39, 4 September 2015 (UTC) | ||
| == Block needed, and I'm involved == | |||
| Would you mind giving ] an extended block for harassment and stalking? I already made of another admin, but in response I was told essentially "no big deal". Basically, Orlady blocked him nearly two years ago for sustained incivility toward me, and in response, he then to be "watching the both of you for the next time you try what you did to me to someone else. So watch out. I'll be leading the charge for you at ANI and Arbcom till you resign or someone at wikipedia shows some guts around here to take away your absolute power to do harm to someone for absolute bullshit!" This has kept up incessantly since then, together with immediate assumptions of bad faith and attacks whenever I do or say something about it, and even making complaints about unrelated actions, e.g. objecting to my participation in the "Admin help needed blocking a sock farm" section at ]: ''That these blocks were done on flimsy evidence and at the same time permanently staining each user's account history was as I said appalling. Stronger adjectives, disgraceful being just one, are actually more fitting for what you and any other administrator did in those wrong blocks.'' | |||
| The last straw has involved his edits at ] — as you can see from , his first edit to the page came just a few hours after mine (the "one such request" diff demonstrates that this is his pattern, following me to the most random topics on which I edit), and when I reverted on substantive grounds (he added an inapplicable category) and told him that I wouldn't explain beyond the obvious fact that it was inapplicable, I was given a with continued assumptions of bad faith, i.e. accusations that I reverted him because I don't like him criticizing me (funny, I didn't revert when he put in some more-applicable categories), and repeating his accusations of incompetence. So, once again...someone pledges to stalk me to get rid of me, he follows me to lots of articles he's never edited before to demonstrate that he's following me, and he tries to make trouble for me in incidents completely unrelated to his own actions. Would you mind putting an end to this? ] (]) 20:02, 6 September 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:02, 6 September 2015
|
.jpeg){kind=small}
 | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
 | If I leave a message for you: Please respond on your talk page. I will add it to my watchlist, so you don't need to notify me, unless I don't respond when a response is expected.
|
| Please leave a new message. |
Regarding page deletion
Hello sir/madam,
I'm contacting you regarding the deletion of this page: https://en.wikipedia.org/Bharatplaza
It is mentioned there that the reason of page deletion by you is "Article about a website, blog, web forum, webcomic, podcast, browser game, or similar web content, which does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject"
So, if it is possible, please unblock the page and so we can edit the content to reflect your requirement. Thanks...
116.202.80.80 (talk) 06:23, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
- As has been noted on three previous occasions since 2009, there is no credible indication that the company meets Misplaced Pages's notability guidelines for companies. Misplaced Pages is not a business guide. You may wish to pursue drafting an article under the guidelines offered at articles for creation, which will allow you to incubate a prospective article for editors to review. Acroterion (talk) 11:42, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
hi im a noob please help me out, I am writing my first page on Olivia rayson please advise me on what to do.
A kitten for you!
thx
Silenthunder6 (talk) 20:22, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
THX
... for the speedy deletion. If you have a sec, can you also look at ... Maz - Son of Picasso, The Style Selektors, Sodhal Faqir Laghari, Pumpkin Patch, GE Oil and Gas, Alumni Biomedical Sciences, Sophy Robson? LavaBaron (talk) 23:39, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
Block needed, and I'm involved
Would you mind giving WilliamJE an extended block for harassment and stalking? I already made one such request of another admin, but in response I was told essentially "no big deal". Basically, Orlady blocked him nearly two years ago for sustained incivility toward me, and in response, he promised then to be "watching the both of you for the next time you try what you did to me to someone else. So watch out. I'll be leading the charge for you at ANI and Arbcom till you resign or someone at wikipedia shows some guts around here to take away your absolute power to do harm to someone for absolute bullshit!" This has kept up incessantly since then, together with immediate assumptions of bad faith and attacks whenever I do or say something about it, and even making complaints about unrelated actions, e.g. here objecting to my participation in the "Admin help needed blocking a sock farm" section at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive893: That these blocks were done on flimsy evidence and at the same time permanently staining each user's account history was as I said appalling. Stronger adjectives, disgraceful being just one, are actually more fitting for what you and any other administrator did in those wrong blocks.
The last straw has involved his edits at Bellefontaine, Ohio — as you can see from the history, his first edit to the page came just a few hours after mine (the "one such request" diff demonstrates that this is his pattern, following me to the most random topics on which I edit), and when I reverted on substantive grounds (he added an inapplicable category) and told him that I wouldn't explain beyond the obvious fact that it was inapplicable, I was given a large hostile message with continued assumptions of bad faith, i.e. accusations that I reverted him because I don't like him criticizing me (funny, I didn't revert when he put in some more-applicable categories), and repeating his accusations of incompetence. So, once again...someone pledges to stalk me to get rid of me, he follows me to lots of articles he's never edited before to demonstrate that he's following me, and he tries to make trouble for me in incidents completely unrelated to his own actions. Would you mind putting an end to this? Nyttend backup (talk) 20:02, 6 September 2015 (UTC)