| Revision as of 22:35, 21 October 2004 editDostal (talk | contribs)466 editsm fix cat← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:23, 24 October 2004 edit undo195.210.218.96 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| An illustration of mens rea would be the difference between hurting someone voluntarily and accidentally; in the first case, the mens rea, the intention to hurt, is present but not in the second one. | An illustration of mens rea would be the difference between hurting someone voluntarily and accidentally; in the first case, the mens rea, the intention to hurt, is present but not in the second one. | ||
| Another example: if the intention to kill or to act in a way that can predictably lead to the death is not proved, one can not be found guilty of the crime of ] because the definition of this crime includes this condition (to be convicted, you need both the mens rea and the ], also known as the "psychological" and "material" elements); without the mens rea for murder, the accusation will usually turn into ], a different but similar crime that does not require the same mens rea. | Another example: :if the intention to kill or to act in a way that can predictably lead to the death is not proved, one can not be found guilty of the crime of ] because the definition of this crime includes this condition (to be convicted, you need both the mens rea and the ], also known as the "psychological" and "material" elements); without the mens rea for murder, the accusation will usually turn into ], a different but similar crime that does not require the same mens rea. | ||
| == Examples of mens rea in statutes == | == Examples of mens rea in statutes == | ||
Revision as of 14:23, 24 October 2004
Mens rea is a criminal law concept which focuses on the mental state of the accused and requires proof of a positive state of mind such as intent, recklessness, or willful blindness.
An illustration of mens rea would be the difference between hurting someone voluntarily and accidentally; in the first case, the mens rea, the intention to hurt, is present but not in the second one.
Another example: :if the intention to kill or to act in a way that can predictably lead to the death is not proved, one can not be found guilty of the crime of murder because the definition of this crime includes this condition (to be convicted, you need both the mens rea and the Actus reus, also known as the "psychological" and "material" elements); without the mens rea for murder, the accusation will usually turn into manslaughter, a different but similar crime that does not require the same mens rea.
Examples of mens rea in statutes
Model Penal Code: A person commits murder if he (1) purposely or knowingly (2) causes the death of a human being.
Common Law: (a) It shall be unlawful for a person to cause the death of a human being with malice aforethought. (b) A violation of this section is murder in the second degree.