Revision as of 15:19, 3 May 2015 editSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,556,580 editsm Signing comment by 109.60.30.190 - "→Split_stanovništvo: new section"← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:53, 11 October 2015 edit undoKevinNinja (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,099 edits →Battle of France: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Čemu onakva glupasta i dječja pisanja u vezi stanovništva Splita? Zar se takvi članci pišu za enciklopediju? <small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 15:18, 3 May 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | Čemu onakva glupasta i dječja pisanja u vezi stanovništva Splita? Zar se takvi članci pišu za enciklopediju? <small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 15:18, 3 May 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | ||
== Battle of France == | |||
Hello! Sorry to bother you. | |||
Keith-264 is saying that he is going to be reverting our changes to the infobox in the Battle of France. Me and you have clearly come to a decision against his silly proposition, but yet again, he still believes that he is correct and is threatening to change the page once again. I believe that we should contact an administrator if he keeps on reverting this, what do you think? ] (]) 14:53, 11 October 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:53, 11 October 2015
Redirect to:
- From a page move: This is a redirect from a page that has been moved (renamed). This page was kept as a redirect to avoid breaking links, both internal and external, that may have been made to the old page name.
Split_stanovništvo
Čemu onakva glupasta i dječja pisanja u vezi stanovništva Splita? Zar se takvi članci pišu za enciklopediju? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.60.30.190 (talk) 15:18, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Battle of France
Hello! Sorry to bother you.
Keith-264 is saying that he is going to be reverting our changes to the infobox in the Battle of France. Me and you have clearly come to a decision against his silly proposition, but yet again, he still believes that he is correct and is threatening to change the page once again. I believe that we should contact an administrator if he keeps on reverting this, what do you think? KevinNinja (talk) 14:53, 11 October 2015 (UTC)