| Revision as of 15:46, 12 October 2015 editKingsindian (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users8,374 edits →06 October 2015: cmt← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:37, 12 October 2015 edit undoNo More Mr Nice Guy (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers8,461 edits →06 October 2015Next edit → | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| Looks like this user has been suspected of being NoCal100 earlier but was inconclusive. I am resubmitting this. Typical NoCal behaviour , very reminiscient of {{u|All Rows4}} ]: long dormant account reactivated for taking sides with a new user against old editors on the "other side", like Nishidani and Zero. Earlier activity was similar, targeting Pluto2012's edits . As an aside, {{u|HJ Mitchell}}, since the Brad Dyer case is dragging on, may I also suggest that this user be CU'd against them, in addition to the confirmed sock {{u|All Rows4}}? The behaviour is very similar to ]. ] ]] 21:26, 6 October 2015 (UTC) | Looks like this user has been suspected of being NoCal100 earlier but was inconclusive. I am resubmitting this. Typical NoCal behaviour , very reminiscient of {{u|All Rows4}} ]: long dormant account reactivated for taking sides with a new user against old editors on the "other side", like Nishidani and Zero. Earlier activity was similar, targeting Pluto2012's edits . As an aside, {{u|HJ Mitchell}}, since the Brad Dyer case is dragging on, may I also suggest that this user be CU'd against them, in addition to the confirmed sock {{u|All Rows4}}? The behaviour is very similar to ]. ] ]] 21:26, 6 October 2015 (UTC) | ||
| : I just want to add that the user being "supported" here was ] as a sockpuppet - (I have my doubts about whether they are really a sockpuppet) - but the behaviour of FFF is very similar to the All Rows4 sock who was supporting a sock of {{u|Wlglunight93}}. That may not mean much, since so many editors in this area are socks, but something to keep in mind. ] ]] 15:46, 12 October 2015 (UTC) | : I just want to add that the user being "supported" here was ] as a sockpuppet - (I have my doubts about whether they are really a sockpuppet) - but the behaviour of FFF is very similar to the All Rows4 sock who was supporting a sock of {{u|Wlglunight93}}. That may not mean much, since so many editors in this area are socks, but something to keep in mind. ] ]] 15:46, 12 October 2015 (UTC) | ||
| ::Out of curiosity, what exactly do you mean by "typical NoCal behaviour"? All I see there is someone disagreeing with your POV. ] (]) 17:37, 12 October 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ====<big>Comments by other users</big>==== | ====<big>Comments by other users</big>==== | ||
| <small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See ].''</small> | <small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See ].''</small> | ||
Revision as of 17:37, 12 October 2015
NoCal100
NoCal100 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected
Older archives were moved to an archive of the archive because of the page size and are listed below:
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/NoCal100/Archive.
A long-term abuse case exists at Misplaced Pages:Long-term abuse/NoCal100.
06 October 2015
– This SPI case is open.
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Firkin Flying Fox (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
Looks like this user has been suspected of being NoCal100 earlier but was inconclusive. I am resubmitting this. Typical NoCal behaviour here, very reminiscient of All Rows4 here: long dormant account reactivated for taking sides with a new user against old editors on the "other side", like Nishidani and Zero. Earlier activity was similar, targeting Pluto2012's edits here. As an aside, HJ Mitchell, since the Brad Dyer case is dragging on, may I also suggest that this user be CU'd against them, in addition to the confirmed sock All Rows4? The behaviour is very similar to here. Kingsindian ♝♚ 21:26, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
- I just want to add that the user being "supported" here was banned as a sockpuppet - (I have my doubts about whether they are really a sockpuppet) - but the behaviour of FFF is very similar to the All Rows4 sock who was supporting a sock of Wlglunight93. That may not mean much, since so many editors in this area are socks, but something to keep in mind. Kingsindian ♝♚ 15:46, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
- Out of curiosity, what exactly do you mean by "typical NoCal behaviour"? All I see there is someone disagreeing with your POV. No More Mr Nice Guy (talk) 17:37, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Firkin Flying Fox is
Inconclusive due to the use of open proxy (and satellite) services. The user agent is different to two other socks I checked though. Moving to open queue for behavioural analysis. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 03:09, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
Categories: