Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 23:13, 10 August 2006

re: vandalism template

Your userpage was recently vandalized. Someone has been creating rapid-fire accounts to spam that personal attack all over Misplaced Pages. I took your pageblanking as an indication that you wanted the vandalism gone. I took the liberty of deleting the page so the attack is not even in your page history. Hope that's okay. Rossami (talk) 05:10, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Image Deletion

I replied here. Prodego 20:22, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

It is unlikely it would be reverted, but I have deleted them for you. Glad I could help. Prodego 15:29, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

SCIMD-COM

I am an admin. I have some experience of articles on unaccredited universities. I have personally checked the authoritative sources and verified that this is not accredited in the UK. It is an unaccredited institution, and the {{unaccredited}} text is a standard consensus form of words for such institutions. Be warned: you do not WP:OWN this article, and removing verifiable data about accreditation has in the past led to editors being blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Just zis Guy you know? 21:06, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

• Read the above and stop edit-warring. Just zis Guy you know? 21:20, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Stop yourself, you are acting in the same manner. It's pathetic for an admin. to be acting like this. Someone must really have been sleeping on the job the day you got that position. Spike 21:55, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

You are a single purpose account who refuses to accept advice, hints, consensus, mediation, policy, guidelines and authority. There are two ways forward from here: you can learn, or you can leave. No other options are available. Just zis Guy you know? 22:28, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Do your homework, I have made edits on many areas of wikpedia. I accept plenty from people who are worth listening to, you aren't one of them. You don't get to choose who gets to stay here and what they have to do. Go away, you are nothing more than an annoying gnat. Spike 22:30, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Oh I am a good deal more than that. Trust me. Just zis Guy you know? 22:44, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

No, that is all you are. I truly feel sorry for you. It's no wonder your sister committed suicide, I would commit death-by-bottle if had you for family as well. Spike 23:13, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

3RR

Your recent editing history at St Christopher Iba Mar Diop College of Medicine shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Bucketsofg✐ 22:05, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

I understand, but is anyone going to do something about that admin. that is war-editing on the same article? Spike 22:06, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

If you feel he's breached 3RR, then report him here. Bucketsofg✐ 22:15, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

You were the first to revert, you are at three now and one more takes you over the limit (yes, this is Wikilawyering, but you seem utterly unwilling to accept any kind of hint, clue or advice). You are in a minority of one; per pretty much every case I can recall this means you are the one who's wrong. See User:JzG/Tendentious editing. Just zis Guy you know? 22:17, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

From your rather twisted prospective I am sure it seems that way. I am not alone, you just seem to think that everyone is logged on to wikipedia all day long and constantly check what is going on, which, while possibly true for you, is not true for the average person. People may only check this site every day or two, if that often. You can't expect people to just rally around someone right away. Most people do have lives. Spike 22:27, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

This is the Misplaced Pages equivalent of "the lurkers support me by email". Just zis Guy you know? 22:30, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

If you can't understand that people don't spend all day signed on here, you really are sad. Spike 22:31, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

No, no, I fully realise that sometimes they sign out, revert again, and the come back. Just zis Guy you know? 22:44, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

What are you talking about? You really are a paranoid aren't you? Spike 22:45, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Yes I am, actually, but only mildly so, mostly I suffer from anxiety depression, but it's controlled by dosulepin. Thanks for asking. Just zis Guy you know? 23:07, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

At least you admit you are insane. Spike 23:09, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

You're not quite qualified to judge JzG's adminship considering your experience on Misplaced Pages does not extend past editing St Christopher Iba Mar Diop College of Medicine. I fully support JzG's position here because he has been editing this article as a responsible editor (like any one of us can be) while citing from Misplaced Pages:Reliable Sources. I see no conflict-of-interest here since he has not used his admin powers to block or threaten you. If you want to continue to contribute as part of the Misplaced Pages community then it is your obligation to acknowledge the request for mediation. --  Netsnipe    22:15, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Blocked

I've blocked you for 24 hours for blatant sockpuppetry in a transparent attempt to get around WP:3RR. When you return, please do not edit war, and discuss disagreements on the talk pages. Also be aware that if all the editors on a page disagree with you, there is a likely chance that they have a better understanding of what should be on a page, consistent with Misplaced Pages policy. While you are blocked, I suggest you take the time to read certain basic Misplaced Pages policies, especially WP:NPOV. If you still have issues after discussions, I suggest you consider dispute resolution. JoshuaZ 22:56, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

This is bullshit. I would like to see the proof of WP:SOCK. Spike 22:58, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Are you seriously claiming that after you hit 3RR another editor miraculously showed up and starting making the same edits? Please don't insult my intelligence. JoshuaZ 23:00, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

So what you are saying is that you have no proof and are just backing up another admin with no respect for the rules here? I know you have tools to prove that people are WP:SOCK, if you can't do that, it doesn't seem that you have a leg to stand on. Spike 23:01, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

You can easily prove your innocence by posting a request at WP:RFCU. Just zis Guy you know? 23:05, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

I shouldn't have to prove anything. It should be the admin. that has to prove the case. Shouldn't it be "Prove first, block later" not the other way around? Spike 23:06, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

You could always register a complaint against Joshua. Only, be aware, if you do, that Joshua is not only one of the nicest people I know, he's also the one I asked to look after things when I had to go off and watch my sister die, because he is the most caring person I could think of. There is nobody on this project, with the possible exception of Phaedriel, whose assumption of good faith is more apparent. If Joshua thinks you violated WP:SOCK and WP:3RR and is prepared to block for it, then you are in a deep, dark hole and should stop digging. I am not kidding. Just zis Guy you know? 23:12, 10 August 2006 (UTC)