Misplaced Pages

User talk:GeneralizationsAreBad: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:44, 8 November 2015 edit188.220.109.179 (talk) →Vandalism: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 14:47, 8 November 2015 edit undoZzuuzz (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators136,891 edits Undid revision 689642575 by 188.220.109.179 (talk) user is bannedNext edit →
Line 69: Line 69:
:{{reply to|JohnCD}} Thanks. I typically do, but I guess I just didn't for some reason this time. ]<sup>]</sup> 20:09, 6 November 2015 (UTC) :{{reply to|JohnCD}} Thanks. I typically do, but I guess I just didn't for some reason this time. ]<sup>]</sup> 20:09, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
::]! I pointed it out because some people aren't aware of it. Cheers, ] (]) 22:37, 6 November 2015 (UTC) ::]! I pointed it out because some people aren't aware of it. Cheers, ] (]) 22:37, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

== Vandalism ==

You recently accused an editor of vandalism at the incident noticeboard. That's a generalisation, and you say generalisations are bad. If you have a specific instance of vandalism in mind and bring that to the notice of the editor concerned I'm sure that would be a better way of resolving the matter. ] (]) 14:44, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:47, 8 November 2015

There is no Cabal

Welcome! Feel free to leave a message at the bottom, and I'll get back to you. If you're angry and stressed, try listening to this while composing your comment.

vn-6This user talk page has been vandalized 6 times.

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16


This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present.
 If you feel that I have made a mistake of any kind, please let me know. I do make mistakes, and I am happy to talk it out. Uncivil comments will end up in my "Fun Insult Userboxes" section. GAB
Due to increased obligations, my daily Wikitime will be curtailed for the foreseeable future. GAB

MURICA4LIFE

Vandal
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

NOT VANDALISM

I am so sowwy my fwiend

Hi

Aspiring admin
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

I am an aspiring admin though. I will tell folks that next time. --Rabauter (talk) 20:49, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Alright, thanks. GAB 20:50, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
I said god work, not good work. I am encouraging him to be a Christian. --Rabauter (talk) 20:53, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
I see. GAB 20:53, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Yes. I see that we could be editing buddies in the future, despite our shaky start. --Rabauter (talk) 21:01, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Great. GAB 21:30, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting that unwanted piece of vandalism on my talk page. I am very much opposed to editors without an account and username. Peter Horn User talk 01:57, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Any time! I've been really busy at Christian Academy of Louisville. The amount of disruption that can be caused by a bunch of kids is really ridiculous. GAB 01:59, 2 November 2015 (UTC)


Cardinal Sarah

Hi GeneralizationsAreBad,

This Misplaced Pages entry misrepresents Cardinal Sarah's position: "He is also a critic of... growth of LGBT rights" The term "growth of LGBT rights" is not used by Cardinal Sarah, but is projected by the editor. This misrepresentation betrays a bias that violates Misplaced Pages's neutral point of view policy and amounts to slander.

I corrected the misrepresentation by replacing it with the Cardinal's direct quote in question, and provided a source.

Thanks, CR — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cr7777777 (talk • contribs) 02:49, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Thanks very much for getting back to me. I appreciate it. I agree that the talk page is the best place to deal with this issue. Hopefully, we can work out a solution rather than continuing to edit-war. GAB 15:48, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
No problem. In the meantime we should keep the cardinal's direct quote until this is sorted out. Ezium23 and Mean as custard had used the direct quote as well before Contaldo80 modified it with his own wording. Cr7777777 (talk) 16:49, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Attack pages

Hi. When you get an attack page like the one just now, {{db-attack}} is a better tag than {{db-vandalism}}. It automatically blanks the page, puts it in a high-priority queue for admin attention, and generates a suitably fierce message for the author. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 17:35, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

@JohnCD: Thanks. I typically do, but I guess I just didn't for some reason this time. GAB 20:09, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
No worries! I pointed it out because some people aren't aware of it. Cheers, JohnCD (talk) 22:37, 6 November 2015 (UTC)