Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 23:22, 8 November 2015

This is Laszlo Panaflex's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 31 days

Reverting undiscussed moves

Re: Your recent comments at Talk:Siege of Constantinople (Rus' Siege of Constantinople) (860). If you wish to revert a recent undiscussed move (as was the case for this article), you do not need to go through the full RM process even if the move requires an admin (per WP:RMUM). You can propose the move in the Requesting technical moves section of the RM page. —  AjaxSmack  16:17, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for staying on top of this, Laszlo Panaflex. I've found that there have been so many seriously contentious moves, refactoring, and blanking of content on articles on anything surrounding Eastern European Slavs since the recent events in Ukraine that it's impossible to stay on top of the mess being made. There's been a tidal wave of new POV warriors, IP hoppers, and SPAs who've been unable to get a look-in on the current affairs articles who are using the opportunity to create havoc with established, consensus-based articles that I can't stay on top of the editing chaos. Sigh. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 22:28, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

It does get frustrating. I've been dealing with a wave of Mongolian editors/puppets that more or less put me off WP for a while. Most of them have been blocked over the past few days, thankfully. I should not have even gotten involved in this current KR dust up at all. Just that every time I see a newly created red-linked editor EW'ing without explanation I'm compelled to respond. Sigh, also (!) Laszlo Panaflex (talk) 00:57, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

2 steps forward, six steps back. I wish I didn't care... but, until dementia wipes my woes away, I am compelled to persevere despite common sense. Don't let the hordes get you down. Cheers! --Iryna Harpy (talk) 02:24, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Wow. Just learned that over 50 sock accounts leading back to one disruptive user were just blocked. Horde, indeed. No wonder I'm feeling so worn out. Laszlo Panaflex (talk) 03:55, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

There have been a huge number reported that haven't even made it to CU due to the sheer volume. The Ukrainian crisis + Russophobes +Russophiles +Western Asian POVers +anti-US +anti-anti-anti have swollen into a veritable tidal wave. As Daggett would say, "This is nuts!" --Iryna Harpy (talk) 04:10, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Mongols

Can you take a look at this dispute? Oirats&action=history Talk:Oirats#Edit_warring.Rajmaan (talk) 00:16, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Bravo!

Thanks for alphabetizing the flags on the Kievan Rus' page. I'm so sick of the Ukrainian/Russian edit wars on that page. You've given a rational solution to at least one of these conflicts, so editors like Irina Harpy and I can righteously undo future revisions. Paulmlieberman (talk) 17:52, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

A Dobos torte for you!

7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos Torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it. To give a Dobos Torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen (☎) 01:11, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Is there something personal.

Is there something personal you have against me to revive the old Ottoman Armenian picture?, I'm willing to go back to the article and have another round of discussion the image if this is your plan? The issue was resolved long ago Alexis Ivanov (talk) 04:50, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Assume_bad_faith: Stop assuming bad faith in my edits, thank you. Alexis Ivanov (talk) 05:41, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

As noted by numerous editors in these ANI and EW discussions, this is a pattern of combative behavior for you. It is difficult to assume good faith when you constantly make patronizing remarks, insults, and accusations. I have not seen a single interaction that you have engaged in that did not include this sort of disruptive behavior. It is ironic that you link to ABF, as a number of the examples of bad faith listed there could be taken directly from your edit summaries and talk page remarks. You ask if this is something personal to me, yet at least a dozen editors complain about your behavior at the discussions above. That should tell you something. Laszlo Panaflex (talk) 16:28, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

>It is difficult to assume good faith when you constantly make patronizing remarks, insults, and accusations.
It's also equality difficult when people lie to me and accuse me of wrongdoings and stalk me and try to gather forces, I will be the better man and forgive you for all your wrongdoings at me.
>I have not seen a single interaction that you have engaged in that did not include this sort of disruptive behavior.
Again please stop accusing me and stop spreading misinformation, just because you never saw Chinese person doesn't mean Chinese person doesn't exist. It;s not my fault that you are to eager to spread misinformation about me.
>You ask if this is something personal to me
Yes I ask if there is a personal issue you have me that you want to deal with it in your talk page as I came here to inquire about it. You are ready to bring up past incidents and fuel the fire. These behavior reminded me of middle school students or people who hod grudge for long.
>yet at least a dozen editors complain about your behavior at the discussions above.
Again you are using an Argumentum ad populum which is a fallacy.
>That should tell you something.
It tells me nothing or did you expect me to roll down and worship you? Alexis Ivanov (talk) 23:22, 8 November 2015 (UTC)