Revision as of 23:09, 10 November 2015 editPoeticbent (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers29,717 edits Undid revision 690037999 by Seagull123 (talk) → attack page written by an anon, you gotta do better than that← Previous edit |
Revision as of 23:10, 10 November 2015 edit undoPoeticbent (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers29,717 edits WP:TALK policy guidelinesNext edit → |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
{{WikiProject Poland|class=stub|importance=low}} |
|
{{WikiProject Poland|class=stub|importance=low}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
==17 February 2014== |
|
I added some citation tags to the article. Reference number 4 is a blog. Can it be considered a credible source? Furthermore, the conclusions drawn from this blog entry are only loosely based on it. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 10:27, 17 February 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
I added some citation tags to the article. Reference number 4 is a blog. Can it be considered a credible source? Furthermore, the conclusions drawn from this blog entry are only loosely based on it. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 10:27, 17 February 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
I added some citation tags to the article. Reference number 4 is a blog. Can it be considered a credible source? Furthermore, the conclusions drawn from this blog entry are only loosely based on it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.177.105.203 (talk) 10:27, 17 February 2014 (UTC)