| Revision as of 20:30, 11 August 2006 editCowman109 (talk | contribs)6,540 edits →[]: Harrassment← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:36, 11 August 2006 edit undoKwame Nkrumah (talk | contribs)1,129 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| From ], to me: | |||
| :''How dare you get rid of my own response on MY OWN page? You don't deserve anything from me, you're the lousiest Misplaced Pages editor I've ever seen. --] 23:45, 10 August 2006 (UTC)'' | |||
| == Three-Revert Rule == | |||
| You are in danger of violating the ] on Ukraine national football team. Please cease further reverts or you may be ] from further editing. <!-- Template:3RR4 --> ] (]) 22:16, 10 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Removing talk page warnings== | |||
| Please do not remove warnings and other content from your talk page. It is considered ] and may be ]. You can ] it instead. ] (]) 22:16, 10 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| : Ok. I simply read the text and removed it because it was no longer useful, but if the rules require to keep all the warnings I'll keep them. I am just not sure about one thing: should I keep ''all'' the comments, or can delete the non-warning threads after they are "closed"?--] 23:35, 10 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::I strongly recommend keeping (or ]) them all, but there is nothing against deleting a non-warning message that you have replied to. ] (]) 00:00, 11 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Sock puppets== | |||
| For your information, it is considered a violation of ] to create new accounts to circumvent restrictions or make a position seem like it has more support than it sounds. New users do not make their first post on ], as ] did. While I have no evidence to accuse you of anything and thus do not do so, I would just like to bring all this to your attention. ] (]) 22:16, 10 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| : Is there a way I can prove it is not a sockpuppet of mine? Also, I read in ] there are allowed uses of sockpuppets, such as "Keeping heated issues in one small area".--] 23:35, 10 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == 3RR Response == | |||
| Hi and thank you for your response to a 3RR violation. Although I may not agree with your ruling, I will accept it as is. The problem now is that the same person has now began harassing me, , on my own talk page and is deleting my OWN responses without my permission. I'm not exactly sure what the right thing for me to do is, but I just want nothing to do with this guy. I apologize for some of the strong language that I've used in my responses, but I have never seen anyone as persistent as this poster. Thanks and let me know, --] 23:50, 10 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Before your decision, I put a 3RR warning in his talk page, which Palffy removed. When you wrote me that it is forbidden to remove warnings, I readded it, with your text as an explanation: he removed it again. My question is if the keep-the-warning rule applies to each contributor, or only to selected ones.--] 23:54, 10 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::I'm just heading to bed, can you please post on ] and another admin will sort it out. ] (]) 23:59, 10 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| I feel that you should stop putting the three revert rule warning on ] userpage. He has already gotten the message, and now he is feeling harassed. It is probably best to simply step away from him as this conflict is clearly not getting anywhere. The page is now protected, so it's best to continue discussion on the talk page. Thank you. <font color="DarkGreen">]</font><sup>]</sup> 18:42, 11 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :This time I will ask you to please stop provoking Palffy and posting comments on his user talk page that could appear as confrontational. I already asked you to leave him alone, so please stop making edits that could be viewed as harrassment. Thank you. <font color="DarkGreen">]</font><sup>]</sup> 20:30, 11 August 2006 (UTC) | |||