Revision as of 18:54, 10 August 2006 editGoethean (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users40,563 edits roskam← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:02, 12 August 2006 edit undoJahiegel (talk | contribs)13,228 edits Peter RoskamNext edit → | ||
Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
I'm wondering why you oppose adding the Josh Marshall text to the Roskam article. Feel free to reply — ] ] 18:54, 10 August 2006 (UTC) | I'm wondering why you oppose adding the Josh Marshall text to the Roskam article. Feel free to reply — ] ] 18:54, 10 August 2006 (UTC) | ||
==]== | |||
I was asked, as I set out, in a bit more detail, at ], to act as an ] for ] relative to the Roskam article, and I have attempted to delineate precisely those issues about which Joe is concerned and to frame several questions rather clearly in order that a focused discussion might be undertaken. On Joe's behalf, and in view of my appreciation for the advancement of the project, I'd ask that, at your leisure, you offer your views at the Roskam talk page. Thanks very kindly in advance! ] 05:02, 12 August 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:02, 12 August 2006
Hi.
Welcome
|
roskam
Hi Propol,
I'm wondering why you oppose adding the Josh Marshall text to the Roskam article. Feel free to reply here — goethean ॐ 18:54, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
Peter Roskam
I was asked, as I set out, in a bit more detail, at Talk:Peter Roskam, to act as an advocate for Joehazelton relative to the Roskam article, and I have attempted to delineate precisely those issues about which Joe is concerned and to frame several questions rather clearly in order that a focused discussion might be undertaken. On Joe's behalf, and in view of my appreciation for the advancement of the project, I'd ask that, at your leisure, you offer your views at the Roskam talk page. Thanks very kindly in advance! Joe 05:02, 12 August 2006 (UTC)