Revision as of 01:20, 21 November 2015 editLjL (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers10,998 edits →Sanctions template: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:32, 21 November 2015 edit undoVolunteer Marek (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers94,123 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 234: | Line 234: | ||
How longer is this nonsense going to continue, I wonder... some of those sanctions-championing people are really bitter-spirited about it. At the same time, I don't see my motion to suspend them having very much following. I bet someone will re-add the template again soon, for the n-th time. ] (]) 01:20, 21 November 2015 (UTC) | How longer is this nonsense going to continue, I wonder... some of those sanctions-championing people are really bitter-spirited about it. At the same time, I don't see my motion to suspend them having very much following. I bet someone will re-add the template again soon, for the n-th time. ] (]) 01:20, 21 November 2015 (UTC) | ||
{{Ivmbox | |||
|'''Please read this notification carefully:'''<br>A ] has authorised the use of ] for pages related to the ] and the ]. The details of these sanctions are described ]. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a ''']''', as described ]. | |||
] is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means ] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the ], our ], or relevant ]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as ], ], or ]. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged ]. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. | |||
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date. | |||
| Commons-emblem-notice.svg | |||
| icon size = 50px}} |
Revision as of 07:32, 21 November 2015
Kendrick7 is taking a short wikibreak and will be back on Misplaced Pages December 1st |
Archive |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
March of the prostitutes
Just saw your new article. Can't give you a specific timeframe, but the Grand Rapids Michigan police did something similar about 15 years ago. Just prior to a national church convention, they rounded up all the hookers, arraigned them on whatever pretense the busted them on,put them on a bus and released them on their own recognizance in Alpena, 250 miles away. For what it's worth. :) John from Idegon (talk) 06:00, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
Al-Arab News Channel
Hi Kendrick, glad you liked my edit :). I've started a discussion on a different edit at Talk:Al-Arab_News_Channel. Boud (talk) 21:51, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Roswell Lee Evans
Hello, Kendrick7. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Roswell Lee Evans, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:
- edit the page
- remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
- save the page
Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Arbustum (talk) 18:46, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Glossip v. Gross, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cruel and unusual (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Roger Ver for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roger Ver is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Roger Ver until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tenaqzn'f Fbvyrq Gubat (talk) 09:31, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Template
Constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made has been reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.
Ouch! You've used a template to send a message to an experienced editor. Please review the essay Misplaced Pages:Don't template the regulars or maybe listen to a little advice. Doesn't this feel cold, impersonal, and canned? It's meant in good humour. Best wishes. - Happysailor 16:39, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
- You're right, I dun screwed up. And despite your templated advice, I've replied on your talk page anyway :) -- Kendrick7 01:34, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Quixotic plea
You are invited to join the discussion at Misplaced Pages talk:Wikipediholism test. Thanks. — {{U|Technical 13}}
06:33, 23 May 2015 (UTC)Template:Z48
Nomination of Eric Casebolt for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eric Casebolt is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Eric Casebolt until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. VQuakr (talk) 05:28, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Eric Casebolt
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Eric Casebolt requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Kiteinthewind 07:15, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
FYI
I do not know how long editors have not been allowed to remove speedy tags from pages they created, but it has been at least five years. The notification immediately above also explained this to you. VQuakr (talk) 08:20, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
June 2015
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at 2015 Texas pool party incident. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Misplaced Pages this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. VQuakr (talk) 04:02, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. The thread is Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Kendrick7 reported by User:VQuakr (Result: ). Thank you. VQuakr (talk) 04:37, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
June 2015
Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on 2015 Texas pool party incident. Claiming an edit is vandalism merely due to the editor's participation in an AfD on the article is not assuming good faith of that editor. GregJackP Boomer! 06:12, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Brain fart for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brain fart is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Brain fart (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Psychonaut (talk) 11:56, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
Eric Casebolt
A tag has been placed on Eric Casebolt, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo, or other unlikely search term.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you believe that there is a reason to keep the redirect, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}}
to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Compassionate727 (talk) 17:38, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Vince Gunter
The article Vince Gunter has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Non-notable. Only secondary source coverage is for a single introduction of President Obama at an event.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. agtx 22:59, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
Ways to improve Dan and Farris Wilks
Hi, I'm Sulfurboy. Kendrick7, thanks for creating Dan and Farris Wilks!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. .
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Sulfurboy (talk) 20:45, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fitzsimmons-Maher Prizefight, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mexican and American (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Roger Ver for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roger Ver is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Roger Ver (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. 71.167.144.135 (talk) 04:32, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Digital life form listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Digital life form. Since you had some involvement with the Digital life form redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 03:40, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Your contributed article, Palestine (non-disambiguation)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Palestine (non-disambiguation). First, thank you for your contribution; Misplaced Pages relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Palestine. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Misplaced Pages. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Palestine – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.
If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Misplaced Pages looks forward to your future contributions. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 09:50, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Montgomery v. Louisiana, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Juvenile (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
Palestine Disambiguation Page
Hey Kendrick7, I wanted to let you know that I undid your edits on Palestine, since neither edit improved the content of the page. If you would like to discuss the validity of these, please take it up on the Talk Page. bojo1498 talk 12:42, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
Requesting guidance
Greeetings
It seems you have been working on culture related some articles too. I am requesting your kind guidance for change of name of one article. When I started working on a new article recently, presently named Poles in mythology actual article name was some thing different, actually due to some misunderstandings some one changed name of the article to Poles in mythology. Matter of the fact is I wanted to cover cultural aspects and festive celebrations as an umbrella article and wanted to have historical mythological, worships wherever concerned as a small part of the main article.
Poles in mythology is altogether a different subject when I am doing research and writing cultural aspects of festive celebrations are also coming up simultaneously and I am coming to a conclusion that for covering cultural aspects of festive celebrations of 'pole' we need to have a separate umbrella article altogether so we will not have more confusions and misunderstandings. Either we need to change present article name or split and create a new cultural aspect related article.
Please let me know your openion and if you are positive to my suggessions what should be the new articles name ? In fact you can join in discussion at Talk:Poles_in_mythology#Change_of_article_name
Looking forward to your kind guidance
Thanks and warm regards Mahitgar (talk) 06:25, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
LOL
Re: comment at the "pole worship" RM. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ⱷ҅ᴥⱷ≼ 21:58, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of John Doe law
Hello Kendrick7,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged John Doe law for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Misplaced Pages article, ].
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Mr.Bob.298 (talk) 03:42, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
Murray Hill Inc. listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Murray Hill Inc.. Since you had some involvement with the Murray Hill Inc. redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 07:27, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Citizens United case listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Citizens United case. Since you had some involvement with the Citizens United case redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 07:37, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Citizens United ruling listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Citizens United ruling. Since you had some involvement with the Citizens United ruling redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 07:46, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of HDMK
The article HDMK has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Misplaced Pages:General notability guideline and the more detailed Misplaced Pages:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you,
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:55, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of HDMK for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article HDMK is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/HDMK until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. clpo13(talk) 15:49, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
Thank you Kendrik7
Thank you Kendrik7 for welcome message, my intention is to make wikipedia more better by adding academic citations from my field of interest. Editing a page, I still need to learn a lot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sykonos (talk • contribs) 03:20, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
Perfect, I have checked WP Five Pillars, thank you. Will put my efforts to adhere with it all the time. Thank you once again Sykonos (talk) 04:41, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Messing with other people's section titles
Don't do that. That's a pretty quick way to get yourself blocked. Volunteer Marek 17:16, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
Sanctions template
How longer is this nonsense going to continue, I wonder... some of those sanctions-championing people are really bitter-spirited about it. At the same time, I don't see my motion to suspend them having very much following. I bet someone will re-add the template again soon, for the n-th time. LjL (talk) 01:20, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
Please read this notification carefully:
A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.
General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.