Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/ShivLing of Makkeshwar: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:45, 12 August 2006 edit Zora (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers17,728 edits View not notable; evidently held by one personNext edit →
(No difference)

Revision as of 21:45, 12 August 2006

The belief that the Black Stone is a Shiva lingam seems to be held by ONE person, who has been attempting to enshrine it in WP's Kaaba article for many months. Balked, this person is now setting up his own article where he can claim that the Black Stone is in fact a Hindu idol.

As risible and unsupported as it is, this belief would be notable if many people held it; however, we have no evidence that anyone save a lone kook takes this position.

I would put this article up for an expedited deletion on "patent nonsense" grounds, but I'm not sure that it would appear as patent nonsense to everyone. I'm being cautious. Please vote to delete this article. Zora 21:45, 12 August 2006 (UTC)