Revision as of 06:33, 13 August 2006 editSte4k (talk | contribs)3,630 edits →Sucks to be blocked← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:33, 13 August 2006 edit undoSte4k (talk | contribs)3,630 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
How to completely disregard policy and be considered righteous. (<small>Community bans must be supported by a strong consensus and should never be enacted based on agreement between a handful of admins or users.</small>) | How to completely disregard policy and be considered righteous. (<small>Community bans must be supported by a strong consensus and should never be enacted based on agreement between a handful of admins or users.</small>) | ||
How to stalk and harrass people and get away with it. | How to stalk and harrass people and get away with it. |
Revision as of 07:33, 13 August 2006
This user, Ste4k, has been blocked indefinitely from editing Misplaced Pages, per ruling of an administrator named Rebecca, without much explanation at all except for "per ANI". See block log. (toolbox: contributions • page moves • current autoblocks) |
Your user name or IP address has been blocked from editing. You were blocked by Rebecca for the following reason (see our blocking policy): per ANI |
Archive How to completely disregard policy and be considered righteous. (Community bans must be supported by a strong consensus and should never be enacted based on agreement between a handful of admins or users.)
Archive How to stalk and harrass people and get away with it.
Archive Admin archiving method
Archive Kangaroo Court
Smile
Æon has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!
Æon 20:20, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry, guess you don't know how things work around here.
- Sorry, but I'm afraid it's you who doesn't see how things work around here. Several of us really did try to help you. I still think that you could come back and be unblocked if you made some kind of statement that you won't carry on as you did before. But you can't pretend you didn't get plenty of warning and advice. I'm still of the view that if you wanted to come back some acommodation could be reached: indefinite does not mean permanent. Just zis Guy you know? 14:23, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
- Have you lost your ability to read? That person wrote "Smile to others by adding . . . to their talk page". If you think that I can do that, then you do not know how things work around here. Admin, or not, you don't seem to be able to grasp the simple concept of "banned". Your supposition about blocking is equally deluded. The indefinite block is permanent and was intended to be so. Who do think you're kidding?
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ste4k (talk • contribs)
- Have you lost your ability to use common sense? Aeon likely placed the smile without realizing you were blocked. No harm, no foul. --ZimZalaBim (talk) 02:45, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
- The conversation was about "how things work". Why did you choose to digress it to discuss harm and fouls? Instead of addressing the topic why would you make an ad homenim remark about my common sense? Do you feel that insulting a person's intelligence is helpful? Haven't you anything better to do than give people the impression that the ideas "how things work around here" and "harm and foul" are equivalent? Added any content lately? Let's take a peek... Oh MY! You should really be more careful. Edits like this are considered to be "obstruction", or didn't you know that? Thanks for pointing out, though, that there is a good reason to have the tags left on top of this page.
- Ste4k, relax, will ya? My sarcasm didn't translate. You made some silly remark about someone losing their ability to read, so I replied with a similarly silly remark using the same wording about using common sense. --ZimZalaBim (talk) 11:59, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
- Your ability to digress needs as much work as your ability to judge the mood of another person; quite a lot. By writing here, "Ste4k relax", you are trying to give other people the impression that my mood is not relaxed. Why? What is your motive behind making sarcastic remarks that try to pursuade others about my mood? You didn't answer any of my questions, and you again made an ad homenim remark about my intelligence. My remark was not silly and it was intended to point out the actual words on the page, which were, "adding . . . to their talk page".
- Ste4k, relax, will ya? My sarcasm didn't translate. You made some silly remark about someone losing their ability to read, so I replied with a similarly silly remark using the same wording about using common sense. --ZimZalaBim (talk) 11:59, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
- OH LOOK WHO YOU ARE! Thanks for making that clear as mud, sock puppet. Now I know why you interrupted the conversation above. Guy hasn't any place to answer my comments now, thanks to your sly little digression there. Did you learn tricks like that here on Misplaced Pages, or do you normally interrupt peoples' conversations in public? I should have known it was you since you've done that sort of thing to me before.
- Changing one's user name is not sockpuppetry. Relax. --ZimZalaBim (talk) 11:59, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
- See this from the same page, then go talk to Tony Sidaway, MangoJuice, TangoTango, and JD_UK. It's your responsibility to let other people know, puppet. Instead of making assumptions about other peoples' moods, maybe you should ask them first. You are probably so accustomed to interacting with the negative element that you carry your defense mechanisms around like baggage when reading simple neutral facts. Reverting/deleting remarks that show the project to be other than your idyllic perception is lying to yourself. So what if that remark was made in bad faith? This is my talk page and that you were associating yourself with a bad faith RfC was exactly what I told you to begin with. You would prefer to delete evidence to the contrary of your position, rather than accept it and reply. And you signed your name to that RfC which condemns me for doing exactly what you just did: removing comments from talk pages. From my perspective, you are a hypocrite by definiton.
- Changing one's user name is not sockpuppetry. Relax. --ZimZalaBim (talk) 11:59, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
- The conversation was about "how things work". Why did you choose to digress it to discuss harm and fouls? Instead of addressing the topic why would you make an ad homenim remark about my common sense? Do you feel that insulting a person's intelligence is helpful? Haven't you anything better to do than give people the impression that the ideas "how things work around here" and "harm and foul" are equivalent? Added any content lately? Let's take a peek... Oh MY! You should really be more careful. Edits like this are considered to be "obstruction", or didn't you know that? Thanks for pointing out, though, that there is a good reason to have the tags left on top of this page.
- Have you lost your ability to use common sense? Aeon likely placed the smile without realizing you were blocked. No harm, no foul. --ZimZalaBim (talk) 02:45, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
Sucks to be blocked
Don't it? --Nscheffey 07:42, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
- Have you been blocked for stalking people? Sorry I missed the arbitration hearing on you, but good to know somebody finally stopped your abuse.
What purpose does this serve?
Any of this? If you want to come back, it doesn't help. If you don't, just walk away... JChap T/E 15:02, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
- and if otherwise? What business do you have trying to impose your personal dichotomous philosophy onto a person whom you have publicly stated you have ill regard? I am glad you had enough sense not to sign that RfC. Can't blame you for not wanting to defend a pariah, and nobody is ever required to provide evidence. My guess is that you're a prosecuting attorney and have very little if any experience on the defense side.
Ding dong, the Witch is dead!
So, so happy someone decided to ban this woman. America Online user 172.190.213.238 16:30, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
Please fuck off and die
Yes, I was just inquiring into the likelihood that you would consider fucking off and dying. It would brighten the day of ever so many people. Thanks, hun. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by America Online user 172.191.108.15 (talk • contribs) . regarding A Course in Miracles