| Revision as of 11:00, 19 December 2015 editSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,555,772 edits Added {{tilde}} note.← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:39, 23 December 2015 edit undoRicky81682 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users161,010 edits →ARBCOM alert notice: new sectionTag: contentious topics alertNext edit → | ||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
| Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-tilde --> --] (]) 11:00, 19 December 2015 (UTC) | Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-tilde --> --] (]) 11:00, 19 December 2015 (UTC) | ||
| == ARBCOM alert notice == | |||
| {{Ivm|2=''This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does '''not''' imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.'' | |||
| '''Please carefully read this information:''' | |||
| The Arbitration Committee has authorised ] to be used for pages regarding ], a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is ]. | |||
| Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means ] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the ], our ], or relevant ]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as ], ], or ]. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. | |||
| }}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> | |||
| : Regarding ], no other article anywhere uses the word "verified" to refer to claims of ''any'' type. That is because unverified claims of any type are inappropriate. You are only using verified for what reason I can't figure out because "unverified" claims aren't going to be in the tables no matter what. See ]. -- ] (]) 20:39, 23 December 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:39, 23 December 2015
Welcome!
Hello, GreatGreen, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for List of living supercentenarians. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Getting Started
- Introduction to Misplaced Pages
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! — TheJJJunk 22:13, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
List of German supercentenarians
Do not blindly revert all edits under the guise of calling it vandalism. If you have a particular issue then discuss it. The pending and unverified claims are not reliable sources as have been repeatedly discussed and do not belong in any article. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 00:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
- I have started a discussion at Talk:List of German supercentenarians. Please explain to me what your exact concerns are. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 08:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Regarding this article. Do NOT restore the chronological list section because it cannot be sourced. Unsourced information has no business being on Misplaced Pages. CommanderLinx (talk) 08:31, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- Of course it can be sourced by the links given above. And the problem is also that articles you voted for delation like Charlotte Klamroth involved these information. The article was eloborated before changing all the way down and now the problem is just half of the sources are obtained. So this problem is caused by people like you and it is a great pitty that you just talk about the same over and over again without noticing it is your fault. E.g. when Mrs Henze passed away all media named her as Germanys OLP, and this goes for so many other SCs as well, so I don't get what the problem is. If it that media are claiming this than I do not know how to handle wiki itself because so many information of all articles are not scientifical...GreatGreen 10:48, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Misplaced Pages. When you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (
or 
) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 11:00, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
ARBCOM alert notice
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Longevity, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.- Regarding List of German supercentenarians, no other article anywhere uses the word "verified" to refer to claims of any type. That is because unverified claims of any type are inappropriate. You are only using verified for what reason I can't figure out because "unverified" claims aren't going to be in the tables no matter what. See Talk:List_of_German_supercentenarians#.22Verified.22_claims. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 20:39, 23 December 2015 (UTC)