| Revision as of 14:11, 15 August 2006 editDbachmann (talk | contribs)227,714 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:12, 15 August 2006 edit undoDbachmann (talk | contribs)227,714 edits not a direct quoteNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| '''Indophobia''' is essentially the opposite of ]: It often refers as irrational andipathy towards of ]n concepts, in particular ], especially in the ]. | '''Indophobia''' is essentially the opposite of ]: It often refers as irrational andipathy towards of ]n concepts, in particular ], especially in the ]. | ||
| ⚫ | Trautmann (1997) argues that British Indophobia was constructed by ] and ] and its chief architects were ] and ]. | ||
| Trautmann (1997) argues that | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| == See also == | == See also == | ||
Revision as of 14:12, 15 August 2006
Indophobia is essentially the opposite of Indomania: It often refers as irrational andipathy towards of Indian concepts, in particular Hindu culture, especially in the Western world.
Trautmann (1997) argues that British Indophobia was constructed by Evangelicalism and Utilitarianism and its chief architects were Charles Grant and James Mill.
See also
  | This Indian history-related article is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |
References
- Thomas R. Trautmann, Aryans and British India, University of California Press (1997), ISBN 0-520-20546-4, chapter 4: British Indophobia