| Revision as of 00:03, 10 January 2016 editLegobot (talk | contribs)Bots1,670,042 edits →Please comment on Talk:Josip Broz Tito: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:15, 10 January 2016 edit undoDennis Bratland (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users61,245 edits →RfC on winningest?: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| The ] is asking for participation in ]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 38852 --> ] (]) 00:03, 10 January 2016 (UTC) | The ] is asking for participation in ]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 38852 --> ] (]) 00:03, 10 January 2016 (UTC) | ||
| == RfC on winningest? == | |||
| Are you going to go around to every FA and GA that uses the word "winningest" and quietly change it and hope nobody notices the pattern? Wouldn't it be more honest to start an RfC and seek consensus for a change across a large number of articles? The way you're going about it isn't exactly legitimate, and it suggests -- once again -- that your interest is a bit too personal. Just a suggestion. You do what you want. --] (]) 22:15, 10 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:15, 10 January 2016
Please comment on Talk:Josip Broz Tito
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Josip Broz Tito. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
RfC on winningest?
Are you going to go around to every FA and GA that uses the word "winningest" and quietly change it and hope nobody notices the pattern? Wouldn't it be more honest to start an RfC and seek consensus for a change across a large number of articles? The way you're going about it isn't exactly legitimate, and it suggests -- once again -- that your interest is a bit too personal. Just a suggestion. You do what you want. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 22:15, 10 January 2016 (UTC)