| Revision as of 06:49, 4 August 2004 editShaunMacPherson (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers3,043 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:18, 31 October 2004 edit undo67.70.164.126 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ''An event mentioned in this article is a ]'' | ''An event mentioned in this article is a ]'' | ||
| ------ | ------ | ||
| dickweeds | |||
| hot pants | |||
| I'm planning to write a major article on the Yom Kippur War (like I did with the ]), but it may yet take a while to write it (lots of material, viewpoints). --] | |||
| ball lickers, aka you guys | |||
| here my roar. ''''finito'''' espinito spoony | |||
| Suprisingly, this article does not even state why it | |||
| is called "Yom Kippur War", although it contains a lot | |||
| of other interesting information. --] | |||
| suck it! | |||
| This may be an English-to-Hebrew mistake (on my part) but I believe the name is Avraham "Bren" Adan (as opposed to Avraham "Bern" Eden). (from the book "On the Banks of the Suez ..." by the same). Additionally, I think it's important to note that this was considered one of the biggest Arab victories over Israel ever (despite the outcome) to the point that Eqypt currently still celebrates the date the war began. Likewise this war precipitated the resignation of Golda Meir as Prime Minister of Israel (among other notable Israeli politicians and military) and wwas considered one of the worst wars for Israel (by Israelis). Also in your copy, you stated that Egypt didn't plan on developing on their initial successes which is not entirely true. The Egyptian military headed by Abu-Iziz (if I remember the name correctly) plan (Badr) stated that all eastern bank crossings were to be consolidated *before* advancing further east. The actual objective was to capture the whole of the Sinai and Gaza. The actual reason why the Egyptian advance stalled was that they could not overrun the Bar-Lev line as completely as they had planned to. This was due in part to Israeli soldiers who fought extremely bravely, but more due to the fact that there was confusion, hesitation and ultimately failure at evacuating the strongpoints along the canal from the Southern Command (under Gonen at the time). - Baraq Baron Ben-Gideon Bacharach (baraq@dmech.org) | |||
| ⚫ | warheads were discovered moving toward Egypt.''' James Schlesinger sent U.S. forces to the Middle East without notifying NATO. The third time the United States reached DEFCON 3 was during the September 11, 2001 attacks. | ||
| What about the Bomb? ] 22:23, 29 Sep 2003 (UTC) | |||
| What about it? This war didn't go nuclear at all. ] | |||
| There was the possibility of nuclear war during this war but no mention is made about it. From the ] article: | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| I am not familiar with this war but I think that the nuclear aspect should be mentioned since the word 'nuclear' isnt found in the article at all. --] 06:49, 4 Aug 2004 (UTC) | I am not familiar with this war but I think that the nuclear aspect should be mentioned since the word 'nuclear' isnt found in the article at all. --] 06:49, 4 Aug 2004 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 01:18, 31 October 2004
An event mentioned in this article is a May 31 selected anniversary
dickweeds
hot pants
ball lickers, aka you guys
here my roar. 'finito' espinito spoony
suck it!
warheads were discovered moving toward Egypt. James Schlesinger sent U.S. forces to the Middle East without notifying NATO. The third time the United States reached DEFCON 3 was during the September 11, 2001 attacks.
I am not familiar with this war but I think that the nuclear aspect should be mentioned since the word 'nuclear' isnt found in the article at all. --ShaunMacPherson 06:49, 4 Aug 2004 (UTC)