| Revision as of 17:00, 15 January 2016 editBiscuittin (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers69,374 edits link← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:01, 15 January 2016 edit undoBiscuittin (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers69,374 edits textNext edit → | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| * http://www.technologyreview.com/featuredstory/520446/the-decline-of-wikipedia/ | * http://www.technologyreview.com/featuredstory/520446/the-decline-of-wikipedia/ | ||
| * https://posthegemony.wordpress.com/2016/01/09/meltdown-at-wikipedia/ | * https://posthegemony.wordpress.com/2016/01/09/meltdown-at-wikipedia/ | ||
| * http://wikistrategies.net/james-heilman-removed/ | |||
| Page under construction | Page under construction | ||
Revision as of 17:01, 15 January 2016
This page is for the development of policies for the reform of Misplaced Pages. If you think that Misplaced Pages does not need reform then you have nothing to contribute here so please go away. This is a long-term project so do not expect instant results.
Subjects for discussion
- Bullying
- Bias
- Poor administration
- Democracy and consensus
- Fairness
- Other (suggestions welcome)
Who should we approach?
- Misplaced Pages administrators
- Trustees of the Wikimedia foundation
- Regulators (e.g. Ofcom)
- Other (suggestions welcome)
Possibly relevant sources
- http://www.technologyreview.com/featuredstory/520446/the-decline-of-wikipedia/
- https://posthegemony.wordpress.com/2016/01/09/meltdown-at-wikipedia/
- http://wikistrategies.net/james-heilman-removed/
Page under construction