User talk:Ghost of hugh glass: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 03:35, 22 January 2016 editPeterTheFourth (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users5,071 edits →3RR violation: new section← Previous edit		Revision as of 03:43, 22 January 2016 edit undoGhost of hugh glass (talk \| contribs)303 edits →3RR violation Next edit →
Line 75:		Line 75:

	Hi! In your revert of the addition of some tags of possibly unreliable sources , you crossed to your fourth revert within 24 hours on the ] article. Rather than the dealing with the edit warring noticeboard which would probably just recommend a self-revert, I'd like to ask you directly- would you please self revert? ] (]) 03:35, 22 January 2016 (UTC)		Hi! In your revert of the addition of some tags of possibly unreliable sources , you crossed to your fourth revert within 24 hours on the ] article. Rather than the dealing with the edit warring noticeboard which would probably just recommend a self-revert, I'd like to ask you directly- would you please self revert? ] (]) 03:35, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
			:Maybe I don't understand that rule. Is it a revert of the same edit -- or any revert on that article? ] (]) 03:42, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:43, 22 January 2016

Welcome!

Hello, Ghost of hugh glass! Welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Misplaced Pages. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Misplaced Pages, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message. (talk to me) (My edits) @ 04:37, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Getting Started
Contributing to Misplaced Pages The five pillars of Misplaced Pages • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Misplaced Pages is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

WP:Identifying reliable sources

Maybe you think opinion columns in right-wing and left-wing media are reliable sources. They're not. Padding Social Justice Warrior with "sources" that don't satisfy Misplaced Pages's sourcing guidelines doesn't help to establish the phrase's notability. — Malik Shabazz /_Stalk 02:12, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

You seem to be pushing a point of view. Perhaps you should disengage from the topic area, at least until such time as you can be objective. I'd hate to see you be sanctioned. Ghost of hugh glass (talk) 03:20, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

3RR violation

Hi! In your revert of the addition of some tags of possibly unreliable sources here, you crossed to your fourth revert within 24 hours on the Social Justice Warrior article. Rather than the dealing with the edit warring noticeboard which would probably just recommend a self-revert, I'd like to ask you directly- would you please self revert? PeterTheFourth (talk) 03:35, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Maybe I don't understand that rule. Is it a revert of the same edit -- or any revert on that article? Ghost of hugh glass (talk) 03:42, 22 January 2016 (UTC)