Misplaced Pages:Closure requests: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 19:02, 10 February 2016 editLugnuts (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers1,509,055 edits →Misplaced Pages:Categories for discussion/Log/2015 November 14#16th and 17th century in the Southern Netherlands ← Previous edit		Revision as of 21:51, 10 February 2016 edit undoSlimVirgin (talk \| contribs)172,064 edits →Requests for comment: +Next edit →
Line 231:		Line 231:
	====]====		====]====
	Would an uninvolved editor assess the consensus at ] {{Initiated\|10 January 2016\|type=rfc\|done=}}? ] (]) 17:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC)		Would an uninvolved editor assess the consensus at ] {{Initiated\|10 January 2016\|type=rfc\|done=}}? ] (]) 17:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

			====]====
			I'm looking for an admin to close this move request, because of the sensitive nature of it. It's worth noting that a few new or little-used accounts/IPs have commented on both sides. Many thanks, ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 21:50, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

	===Backlogs===		===Backlogs===

Revision as of 21:51, 10 February 2016

v t e Noticeboards
Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes.
General	Administrators Main Incidents Bots Bureaucrats Centralized discussion Closure requests Education Interface admins Main Page errors Open proxies VRT Oversight User permissions
Articles, content	Biographies of living persons Copyrights Questions on media Problems Dispute resolution External links Fringe theories Neutral point of view Original research Pending changes Reliable sources Resource requests Scalable vector graphics Spam Blacklist Whitelist Style Titleblacklist Translation
Page handling	History merges Mergers Splits Moves Protection Importation XfD Articles Redirects Categories Templates Files Miscellany Undeletion
User conduct	Conflict of interest Contributor copyright Edit warring and 3RR Sanctions Personal restrictions General sanctions Contentious topics Sockpuppets Usernames (Requests for comment) Vandalism
Other	Arbitration Committee noticeboard Requests Enforcement Edit filters Requested False positives Questions Help desk Teahouse Reference desk New articles Requests for comment Village pump Policy Technical Proposals Idea lab WMF Miscellaneous WikiProject proposals Discussions for discussion
Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards

Archives

Index

Archive 1	Archive 2	Archive 3
Archive 4	Archive 5	Archive 6
Archive 7	Archive 8	Archive 9
Archive 10	Archive 11	Archive 12
Archive 13	Archive 14	Archive 15
Archive 16	Archive 17	Archive 18
Archive 19	Archive 20	Archive 21
Archive 22	Archive 23	Archive 24
Archive 25	Archive 26	Archive 27
Archive 28	Archive 29	Archive 30
Archive 31	Archive 32	Archive 33
Archive 34	Archive 35	Archive 36
Archive 37	Archive 38	Archive 39

This page has archives. Sections older than 300 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III.

Shortcuts

The Requests for closure noticeboard is for posting requests to have an uninvolved editor assess, summarize, and formally close a discussion on Misplaced Pages. Formal closure by an uninvolved editor or administrator should be requested where consensus remains unclear, where the issue is a contentious one, or where there are wiki-wide implications.

Many discussions do not need formal closure and do not need to be listed here.

Many discussions result in a reasonably clear consensus, so if the consensus is clear, any editor—even one involved in the discussion—may close the discussion. The default length of a formal request for comment is 30 days (opened on or before 11 December 2024); if consensus becomes clear before that and discussion has slowed, then it may be closed early. However, editors usually wait at least a week after an RfC opens, unless the outcome is very obvious, so that there is enough time for a full discussion.

If consensus is unclear, then post a neutral request here for assistance.

Please ensure that your request for a close is brief and neutrally worded. Please include a link to the discussion. Do not use this board to continue the discussion in question. Be prepared to wait for someone to review the discussion. If you disagree with a particular closure, do not dispute it here. You can start discussion at the original page or request a Closure review at Administrators' noticeboard with a link to the discussion page and the policy-based reason you believe the closure should be overturned. See Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Closure review archive for previous closure reviews.

Any uninvolved editor may close most discussions, so long as they are prepared to discuss and justify their closing rationale.

Because requests for closure made here are often those that are the most contentious, closing these discussions can be a significant responsibility. Closers should be familiar with all policies and guidelines that could apply to the given discussion. All closers should be prepared to fully discuss the closure rationale with any editors who have questions about the closure or the underlying policies, and to provide advice about where to discuss any remaining concerns that those editors may have.

A request for comment discussed how to appeal closures and whether an administrator can summarily overturn a non-administrator's closure. The consensus was that closures should not be reverted solely because the closer was not an administrator. However, special considerations apply for articles for deletion and move discussions—see Misplaced Pages:Deletion process#Non-administrators closing discussions and Misplaced Pages:Requested moves/Closing instructions for details.

Once a discussion listed on this page has been closed, please add {{Close}} or {{Done}} and a note to the request here, after which the request will be archived.

Requests for closure

Requests for comment

Misplaced Pages talk:Did you know/Archive 119#The current "indicate all aspects of the article that you have reviewed" requirement: retain or abandon?

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Misplaced Pages talk:Did you know/Archive 119#The current "indicate all aspects of the article that you have reviewed" requirement: retain or abandon? (Initiated 3367 days ago on 23 October 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:43, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

MediaWiki talk:Move-redirect-text#Redr

Would an uninvolved administrator please assess the consensus at MediaWiki talk:Move-redirect-text#Redr (Initiated 3317 days ago on 12 December 2015)? —Godsy_CONT) 19:03, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Talk:David L. Jones#RFC: Inclusion of draft sections

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:David L. Jones#RFC: Inclusion of draft sections (Initiated 3318 days ago on 11 December 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:25, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Muhammad#What should be included for information regarding Aishas' marriage to Muhammad on the Muhammad article?

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Muhammad#What should be included for information regarding Aishas' marriage to Muhammad on the Muhammad article? (Initiated 3325 days ago on 4 December 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:25, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Plovdiv#Including historical names of the city

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Plovdiv#Including historical names of the city (Initiated 3321 days ago on 8 December 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:25, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Done AlbinoFerret 16:39, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Talk:CobraNet#RfC on manufacturer list

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:CobraNet#RfC on manufacturer list (Initiated 3318 days ago on 11 December 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:25, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Anime and manga/Archive 65#RfC: Anime films and production companies

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Anime and manga/Archive 65#RfC: Anime films and production companies (Initiated 3312 days ago on 17 December 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:25, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters#RfC: Should an "a-prefixing" guideline be added to MOS:CT?

There have been about a dozen comments in the last 30 days, but a consensus is not clear. It has not been contentious, but since it affects a WP guideline, an uninvolved editor is requested to assess consensus and close it. (Initiated 3309 days ago on 20 December 2015) Thanks, —Ojorojo (talk) 16:31, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Political correctness#Generally or primarily or something else

It was redated once and it's been ongoing for 54 days now, but discussion has pretty much died down. All of the monitors of Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Language and linguistics voted for a third option, "often": 1, 2, 3 and 4. Current article lead hasn't existed for very long so nothing is yet "stable". --Mr. Magoo and McBarker (talk) 23:57, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Done, discussion is closed. no result. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:19, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Undone I apologize for not explaining well enough but the point was to finally assess concensus as either or, not just closing it. I'll undo the closure in await for someone to actually decide either or. If there is no result it shall just be redated and reopened and the discussion and RfC continued because that is the proper procedure if there is no result yet, not closure. --Mr. Magoo and McBarker (talk) 09:48, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Removed done tag so this will not be automatically archived by the bot. Cunard (talk) 05:31, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Occupation of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge#Proposed merge with Ammon Bundy

Please disposition Talk:Occupation of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge#Proposed merge with Ammon Bundy. --Jax 0677 (talk) 18:29, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Reply - Also, may we archive Talk:Occupation_of_the_Malheur_National_Wildlife_Refuge#RfC:_Rump_Militia? --Jax 0677 (talk) 14:28, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

@Jax 0677: From the perspective of closure, there's no need for the discussion to be kept on the current talk page. The closer should be able to find it, and may or may not choose to dearchive it at that time. After archiving, it may also be helpful to add a link to the ANRFC entry pointing to the new location. Sunrise (talk) 22:15, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Done AlbinoFerret 17:00, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Séralini affair#RfC Regarding content scope and neutrality

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Séralini affair#RfC Regarding content scope and neutrality (Initiated 3315 days ago on 14 December 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 05:31, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Gilles-Éric Séralini#RFC regarding Awards/Honor section

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Gilles-Éric Séralini#RFC regarding Awards/Honor section (Initiated 3314 days ago on 15 December 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 05:31, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Martin McGuinness#Monarch/ appointed by

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Martin McGuinness#Monarch/ appointed by (Initiated 3314 days ago on 15 December 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 05:31, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters#RfC: Should an "a-prefixing" guideline be added to MOS:CT?

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Misplaced Pages talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters#RfC: Should an "a-prefixing" guideline be added to MOS:CT? (Initiated 3309 days ago on 20 December 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 05:31, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages talk:Special:Preferences#RfC: Change Default Math Appearance Setting to MathML

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Misplaced Pages talk:Special:Preferences#RfC: Change Default Math Appearance Setting to MathML (Initiated 3316 days ago on 13 December 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 05:31, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

This should run for another week or two, as it was not properly advertized and got insufficient attention. --Sammy1339 (talk) 19:55, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
- Not done - discussion has recently picked up again with a drive for more participants. Sam Walton (talk) 14:45, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
  - Removed not done template so the bot won't prematurely advertise it. I agree with waiting more time before closing it. Cunard (talk) 02:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Talk:British Empire#RfC: Should the term "superpower" be mentioned regarding the latter years of the British Empire?

Although its been up a week , the date in the RFC has been altered to give the impression it has only just been started. N0n3up clearly doesn't accept a lack of consensus for his proposal and is opposing closure, I think this needs a neutral admin to review the discussion and sentence the closure (or not) as they deem appropriate. As a neutral 3rd party looking at some of the comments being made eg Do that, and it will be reverted. This act will be considered an aggression and the assertion that only he can close the RFC I can see trouble ahead. Hopefully a steely eyed admin can intervene and pour oil on troubled waters. Pinging @Snowded: to let him know I've done this. W C M_email 17:26, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Need a neutral review but even the RfC is tedious, the obsession with inserting superpower against consensus has been running for a coupe of months now. I didn't spot the change of date that really is gaming ----Snowded 00:51, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Wee Kudpung กุดผึ้ง, with all due respect, I would just like to say that this wouldn't had happened if Snowded and Juanriley (two of the stalkers who've constantly slithered towards my edits) wouldn't had been involved regardless of the outcome of the Rfc and discussions. Now personally, I am very accepting with others disagreeing and even reverting my edits. What I am not okay with is Snowded's constant stalking and manipulation of my edits. If you check the British Empire Talk page, you'll see that others didn't respond as much as Snowded did because he was constantly fighting back by constantly posting against my edits that almost looks like a backlash (if you want more examples of his and Juanriley's stalking, leave me a message in my talk page, I promise to take the time to list them all). Yes, I agree that the Rfc ws going for a couple of days, but recently I hadn't had the time to post up-to-date, and besides, it should be deleted in 20 days or so by a bot and not to mention that Misplaced Pages has no deadlines. (N0n3up (talk) 01:35, 29 January 2016 (UTC))

I would ordinarily have left the RFC to run for 30 days or more before resorting to here. The comments made by N0n3up with the bad faith accusations of "stalking" and manipulation not to mention the comments referenced above convinced me this was becoming toxic and required an admin to look at. I was very tempted to take this to WP:ANI. W C M_email 01:47, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Wee Apparently you didn't look at the history involved in my previous post. I would normally concentrate on the topic in hand, but I felt that it was necessary to bring this into light because this dilemma had been one problem in the discussion page in BE talk page. I agree I shouldn't have posted this here and should've probably saved it for ANI. But if you think I posted in bad faith, you're wrong. I also covered the loose ends due to my lack of time and etc.. Again, recheck what I've said, I'm not accusing anyone, I'm simply stating what happened. I apologize for the inconvenience this provoked. (N0n3up (talk) 02:06, 29 January 2016 (UTC))

User:Wiki-Ed and User:Snowded have done an admirable job in trying to keep a well written article intact. On this particular issue I agree with them--though I think we have had disagreements in the past. I hesitated to post here (and there) lately because User:N0n3up will say I am stalking him. In fact, I think this is the first article we came to loggerheads on and lately again I have attempted to keep my presence minimal where and when he starts off on a tirade on other articles we both apparently watch. Juan Riley (talk) 02:24, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Juan Riley First of all, save it for ANI, this is regarding the Rfc. Second, your edits in British Empire, United Kingdom and the American Civil War, France, Suez Crisis, List of pioneers in computer science and Treaty of Versailles say otherwise, All of which you began to edit since I started to edit in them, all beginning in British Empire. It's only a matter of finding your name in the edit history of each article. Again, this is regarding the Rfc, in which I made a mistake mentioning this. (N0n3up (talk) 02:35, 29 January 2016 (UTC))

Nuff said. Juan Riley (talk) 02:39, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Anyhow, Kudpung thought it best to leave it here, just to get back in track of topic, think we went off rail a second there. (N0n3up (talk) 03:47, 29 January 2016 (UTC))

I recommend that the Rfc be allowed to run its (30-day) course. Then place a 1-year moratorium, upon closure of the Rfc. GoodDay (talk) 06:10, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

I agree with GoodDay here this is the most diplomatic way to handle this situation. Reb1981 (talk) 00:09, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Though it hasn't been 30 days, it's about 21 days not including the pre-Rfc related discussion, with absolutely no chance of a consensus for superpower being added to the article. If we include the pre-Rfc discussion? This whole super power dispute has been going on since October 2015. Recommend closing that Rfc now & placing a 1-year moratorium on allowing the topic being raised again. GoodDay (talk) 15:09, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Charli XCX#RFC: MOS:SURNAME and articles related to Charli XCX

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Charli XCX#RFC: MOS:SURNAME and articles related to Charli XCX (Initiated 3297 days ago on 1 January 2016)? Thanks, sst✈ 06:21, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Done Katie 00:49, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/United States presidential election, 2024

This AfD has been open for 18 days with the last !vote being registered more than 3 days ago, following a third relisting. After a thorough conversation with many excellent policy points on all sides, there is a slim majority of 24 !votes for Delete (53% of all opinions registered). LavaBaron (talk) 12:21, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

If I was closing that (which, mercifully, I'm not...), I'd close it as "No consensus" – there are valid points on both sides, and there is not a clear consensus in either direction... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 04:26, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Occupation of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge#Use of Flag Icons in Infobox

Can someone close the RFC here? L.tak (talk) 19:29, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Oldest people#Proposed merge with List of oldest living people

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Oldest people#Proposed merge with List of oldest living people (Initiated 3325 days ago on 4 December 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Done AlbinoFerret 16:05, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Charli XCX#RFC: MOS:SURNAME and articles related to Charli XCX

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Charli XCX#RFC: MOS:SURNAME and articles related to Charli XCX (Initiated 3297 days ago on 1 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Talk:List of ministers of the Universal Life Church#RFC: Reliable sources

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:List of ministers of the Universal Life Church#RFC: Reliable sources (Initiated 3297 days ago on 1 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Habib Ali al-Jifri#RfC: Is the critical content neutral and well sourced?

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Habib Ali al-Jifri#RfC: Is the critical content neutral and well sourced? (Initiated 3296 days ago on 2 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Emmanuel Lemelson#RFC

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Emmanuel Lemelson#RFC (Initiated 3292 days ago on 6 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Snooker#RfC: Does the use of self-published sources in snooker articles violate BLPSPS and SPS?

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Snooker#RfC: Does the use of self-published sources in snooker articles violate BLPSPS and SPS? (Initiated 3292 days ago on 6 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Panagiotis Kone#RfC: Does the source support labeling Kone as ethnic Greek?

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Panagiotis Kone#RfC: Does the source support labeling Kone as ethnic Greek? (Initiated 3291 days ago on 7 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Socialism#RfC: What should be the topic of this article? 2

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Socialism#RfC: What should be the topic of this article? 2 (Initiated 3298 days ago on 31 December 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Flight and expulsion of Germans (1944–50)#Flight and expulsion of Germans (1944–50): RfC on lede passage

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Flight and expulsion of Germans (1944–50)#Flight and expulsion of Germans (1944–50): RfC on lede passage (Initiated 3300 days ago on 29 December 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Talk:"Polish death camp" controversy#Request for comments

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:"Polish death camp" controversy#Request for comments (Initiated 3292 days ago on 6 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Josip Broz Tito#RfC January 2016

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Josip Broz Tito#RfC January 2016 (Initiated 3291 days ago on 7 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Slano Blato Landslide#RFC: Should "Salt Mud Slide" be moved to "Slano Blato landslide"?

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Slano Blato Landslide#RFC: Should "Salt Mud Slide" be moved to "Slano Blato landslide"? (Initiated 3289 days ago on 9 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Media franchise#Alright, Bring It!

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Media franchise#Alright, Bring It! (Initiated 3302 days ago on 27 December 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Ethnocracy#RfC: material that does not explicitly refer to ethnocracy

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Ethnocracy#RfC: material that does not explicitly refer to ethnocracy (Initiated 3297 days ago on 1 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Martin McGuinness#"deputy" vs "Deputy"

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Martin McGuinness#"deputy" vs "Deputy" (Initiated 3328 days ago on 1 December 2015)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Martin McGuinness#Monarch/ appointed by

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Martin McGuinness#Monarch/ appointed by (Initiated 0 days ago on 10 January 2025)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Transhumanist politics#Request for Comment: Is Istvan's bus tour relevant?

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Transhumanist politics#Request for Comment: Is Istvan's bus tour relevant? (Initiated 3295 days ago on 3 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Occupation of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge#Use of Flag Icons in Infobox

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Occupation of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge#Use of Flag Icons in Infobox (Initiated 3295 days ago on 3 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

talk:Occupation of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge#Proposed merge with Ammon Bundy

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at talk:Occupation of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge#Proposed merge with Ammon Bundy (Initiated 3288 days ago on 10 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Talk:United Kingdom general election, 2015#RfC: Lead - full term, etc

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:United Kingdom general election, 2015#RfC: Lead - full term, etc (Initiated 3292 days ago on 6 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Antisemitism in the United States#RFC - Antisemitic incidents

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Antisemitism in the United States#RFC - Antisemitic incidents (Initiated 3291 days ago on 7 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Meshblock#Should the title be Meshblock or Mesh Block?

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Meshblock#Should the title be Meshblock or Mesh Block? (Initiated 3292 days ago on 6 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Template talk:ShadowsCommons#Deliberate shadowing

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at the RfC at Template talk:ShadowsCommons#Deliberate shadowing (Initiated 3295 days ago on 3 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Village pump (proposals)#New usergroup with autopromotion to implement arbitration "30-500" bans as a page protection

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Misplaced Pages:Village pump (proposals)#New usergroup with autopromotion to implement arbitration "30-500" bans as a page protection (Initiated 3288 days ago on 10 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Campus sexual assault#"The majority of rape and other sexual assault victims do not report their attacks to law enforcement."

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Campus sexual assault#"The majority of rape and other sexual assault victims do not report their attacks to law enforcement." (Initiated 3283 days ago on 15 January 2016)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 02:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages talk:Manual of Style/Images#"Articles about ethnic groups or similarly large human populations should not be illustrated by a gallery of images of group members"

Could we have an experienced editor or admin assess the consensus at Misplaced Pages talk:Manual of Style/Images#"Articles about ethnic groups or similarly large human populations should not be illustrated by a gallery of images of group members" (Initiated 3290 days ago on 8 January 2016)? Considering the backlog here, I thought it prudent to apply a day early for this biggie. Thank you. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 05:18, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Vehbi_Koç#RfC_on_the_Kasapyan_estate

Would an experienced editor assess the consensus at Talk:Vehbi_Koç#RfC_on_the_Kasapyan_estate (Initiated 3288 days ago on 10 January 2016)? Étienne Dolet (talk) 07:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Statewide opinion polling for the Republican Party presidential primaries, 2016#RfC on inclusion of Overtime Politics polls

Would an uninvolved editor assess the consensus at Talk:Statewide opinion polling for the Republican Party presidential primaries, 2016#RfC on inclusion of Overtime Politics polls (Initiated 3288 days ago on 10 January 2016)? 108.2.58.56 (talk) 17:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Taharrush jamai#Requested move 1 February 2016

I'm looking for an admin to close this move request, because of the sensitive nature of it. It's worth noting that a few new or little-used accounts/IPs have commented on both sides. Many thanks, SarahSV 21:50, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Backlogs

Misplaced Pages:Categories for discussion

This discussion forum has an extensive backlog with approximately 150 discussions that have yet to be closed, the oldest of which is from 2015 October 15. Marcocapelle (talk) 10:06, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Non-free content review

This discussion forum has an extensive backlog where the oldest active entry was started on ~~10 June 2015 ({{Initiated|10 June 2015}}~~), and at the time if me posting this request, the page has 163 discussions that have yet to be closed, several started over a month ago. Steel1943 (talk) 19:10, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Please update {{Initiated}} below as the backlog is (slowly) taken care of.--Aervanath (talk) 19:35, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

(Initiated 3499 days ago on 13 June 2015)

About 155 discussions still to be closed.

Since this discussion board is now deprecated, and there will be no new discussions opened there, I would appreciate some help clearing the backlog.--Aervanath (talk) 21:56, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

I just "did" about 3 of them. For the ones where I believe could really use more discussion, I've been relisting them on WP:FFD (but not in huge droves as that would overwhelm the daily subpages over there.) Steel1943 (talk) 21:59, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
We're getting close to having all these discussions closed. NFCR is now down to 100 open discussions. Also, in November, NFCR was shut down to new requests, directing new requests to WP:FFD; when all of the discussions are closed from NFCR, the noticeboard will be closed and marked as historical. Steel1943 (talk) 18:52, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

XfD

Misplaced Pages:Categories for discussion/Log/2015 November 14#16th and 17th century in the Southern Netherlands

Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts 12:15, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Done Lugnuts 19:02, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Categories for discussion/Log/2015 December 7#Category:Religious law in the United States

Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts 12:17, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Categories for discussion/Log/2015 December 7#Category:19th-century male military personnel & 19th-century businessmen

Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts 12:17, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Categories for discussion/Log/2015 December 7#Category:Taxonomic articles

Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts 12:17, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Categories for discussion/Log/2015 December 8#Category:Meleagrididae

Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts 12:20, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Categories for discussion/Log/2015 December 8#Category:Calvinist and Reformed artists and writers

Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts 12:20, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Categories for discussion/Log/2015 December 9#Rivers and streams of the US

Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts 12:21, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Categories for discussion/Log/2015 December 9#Category:Muslim Chief ministers of Indian states

Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts 12:21, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Categories for discussion/Log/2015 December 10#Category:Oil and gas companies of Australia

Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts 12:21, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Categories for discussion/Log/2015 December 11#Category:Health care companies of the United Kingdom

Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts 12:22, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_December_11#Category:Bangladeshi_festivals

Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts 12:22, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_December_12#Category:Pre-peerage_earls_or_mormaers_of_Scotland

Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts 12:23, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_December_13#Category:Logos_of_the_United_Kingdom_Government

Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts 12:24, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_December_13#Category:Arab_socialist_politicians

Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts 12:24, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_December_13#Category:Political_party_alliances_in_Republika_Srpska

Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts 12:24, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_December_13#Monarchies

Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts 12:24, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_December_14#Category:Songs_about_The_Troubles_.28Northern_Ireland.29

Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts 12:25, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Done Lugnuts 19:31, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_December_14#Category:Rebellions_by_people

Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts 12:25, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_December_15#Category:Deceased_Filipino_actors_and_actresses

Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts 12:26, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_December_15#Category:Founders_of_companies_of_the_United_States

Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts 12:26, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_December_15#Category:Pro-Assadists

Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts 12:26, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_December_15#Category:Anti-Assadists

Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts 12:26, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_December_18#Category:Chief_executives_by_country

Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts 12:28, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_December_18#Category:Cancer_deaths_by_country

Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts 12:28, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_December_20#Category:German_involvement_in_the_Syrian_Civil_War

Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts 12:29, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_December_20#Category:Government_Communications_Headquarters_operations_and_programs

Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts 12:29, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_December_22#Category:Janitors

Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts 12:30, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_December_22#Category:War_in_Afghanistan_.282001.E2.80.93present.29

Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts 12:30, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_December_23#Category:Top_14_squad_navigational_boxes

Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts 12:31, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_December_23#Category:English_Premiership_.28rugby_union.29_squad_navigational_boxes

Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts 12:31, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_December_23#Category:Male_translators

Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts 12:31, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_December_23#Category:Cleaners

Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts 12:31, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_December_23#Category:African_American_missionaries

Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts 12:31, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_December_24#Category:Contemporary_Italian_history

Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts 12:33, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_December_24#Category:Wolverhampton_Council_elections

Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts 12:33, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_December_24#Category:Sheffield_Council_elections

Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts 12:33, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_December_24#Category:Mandarin-language_singers_of_China

Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts 12:33, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_December_26#Irish_poems_by_century

Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts 14:00, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_December_26#Categories_for_regions_of_the_North_Island_and_South_Island_of_New_Zealand

Please could someone look at this and take the necessary action to close it? Thanks. Lugnuts 14:00, 4 February 2016 (UTC)