| Revision as of 02:19, 2 March 2016 editMalik Shabazz (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers106,163 edits OneClickArchiver archived Randolph and Rustin to User talk:Malik Shabazz/Archive 58← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:28, 2 March 2016 edit undoMalik Shabazz (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers106,163 edits →Your comments at AE: replyNext edit → | ||
| Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
| *'''Comment''' Keep your head up {{ping|Malik Shabazz}}. We can thank ourselves that {{ping|MrX}} is not an admin given the poor judgement he has shown in suggesting a block and deliberately taking your comments out of context. MrX you have claimed that Malik had "call him (Guy Macon) a troll and king of the Jews". This is false as your diff demonstrates. In reality Malik stated "I don't know who appointed Guy Macon King of the Jews". Quite materially different to what you have alleged. I must remember to oppose any application for adminship.. Misplaced Pages is not a membership organisation that requires an oath of allegiance. It is not chilling in the slightest to suggest contact with the press. Only those who are in the wrong would oppose such a thing. ] (]) 01:39, 2 March 2016 (UTC) | *'''Comment''' Keep your head up {{ping|Malik Shabazz}}. We can thank ourselves that {{ping|MrX}} is not an admin given the poor judgement he has shown in suggesting a block and deliberately taking your comments out of context. MrX you have claimed that Malik had "call him (Guy Macon) a troll and king of the Jews". This is false as your diff demonstrates. In reality Malik stated "I don't know who appointed Guy Macon King of the Jews". Quite materially different to what you have alleged. I must remember to oppose any application for adminship.. Misplaced Pages is not a membership organisation that requires an oath of allegiance. It is not chilling in the slightest to suggest contact with the press. Only those who are in the wrong would oppose such a thing. ] (]) 01:39, 2 March 2016 (UTC) | ||
| **''Right''. - ]] 01:48, 2 March 2016 (UTC) | **''Right''. - ]] 01:48, 2 March 2016 (UTC) | ||
| There will be no retraction or apology. If you think you all are following common sense and ], you should be proud of the fact that you accept on its face every Christian profession of faith—no matter how proposterous—and put "Presbyterianism" in the infobox as the religion of ], but require a litmus test of your own making for self-identified Jews. What chilling effect? — ] <sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub> 02:28, 2 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:28, 2 March 2016
SEMI-RETIRED This user is no longer very active on Misplaced Pages. |
|
| This is Malik Shabazz's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 5 days  |
|
Search the Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
The Signpost: 24 February 2016
- Special report: WMF in limbo as decision on Tretikov nears
- Op-ed: Backward the Foundation
- Traffic report: Of Dead Pools and Dead Judges
- Arbitration report: Arbitration motion regarding CheckUser & Oversight inactivity
- Featured content: This week's featured content
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
Sojourner Truth
Greetings, I am glad that while you are still "semi-retired" you watch over Truth's article. I hope you stick around. Cheers, Caballero/Historiador 04:10, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you, Caballero1967. I appreciate the kind words. — Malik Shabazz /Stalk 04:13, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
I'd appreciate a comment, if you don't mind
https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests#Bernie_Sanders_Topic_Ban_Appeal_from_Sir_Joseph Sir Joseph 18:43, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Sir Joseph. I'll comment at WP:A/E, which is on my watchlist.
- For future reference, please familiarize yourself with WP:CANVASS, which you may have violated by posting a message here. — Malik Shabazz /Stalk 04:45, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks, I thought since you're not an admin so it's not a vote it wouldn't matter, but I guess with Wiki everything is a problem. And now some admin is proposing a six month ban for me I guess because I dared appeal the initial ban, I think. Although I'm not sure why. Sir Joseph 18:00, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Your comments at AE
Malik, please strongly consider retracting most of your comments at WP:AE. Your characterization of Guy Macon is way over the top. He has dominated the discussions (as have others), and perhaps he's been tendentious, but to call him a troll and king of the Jews clearly violates WP:NPA.
Worse, your threat of going to the press has nearly the same chilling effect as a legal threat. If I were an admin, I would have blocked you until you retracted it.
Again, please consider revising your comments.- MrX 12:25, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
- Malik Shabazz, I see your comments have caused you to be brought to ANI in a complaint. I echo MrX's advice to retract or strike out your remarks which I think were likely posted in the heat of the moment. Liz 20:46, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Keep your head up @Malik Shabazz:. We can thank ourselves that @MrX: is not an admin given the poor judgement he has shown in suggesting a block and deliberately taking your comments out of context. MrX you have claimed that Malik had "call him (Guy Macon) a troll and king of the Jews". This is false as your diff demonstrates. In reality Malik stated "I don't know who appointed Guy Macon King of the Jews". Quite materially different to what you have alleged. I must remember to oppose any application for adminship.. Misplaced Pages is not a membership organisation that requires an oath of allegiance. It is not chilling in the slightest to suggest contact with the press. Only those who are in the wrong would oppose such a thing. AusLondonder (talk) 01:39, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
- Right. - MrX 01:48, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
There will be no retraction or apology. If you think you all are following common sense and WP:No original research, you should be proud of the fact that you accept on its face every Christian profession of faith—no matter how proposterous—and put "Presbyterianism" in the infobox as the religion of a man universally agreed to be lying about his faith, but require a litmus test of your own making for self-identified Jews. What chilling effect? — Malik Shabazz /Stalk 02:28, 2 March 2016 (UTC)