| Revision as of 23:34, 8 March 2016 editRavensfire (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers89,316 edits Warning: Vandalism on Executive Order 11110. (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:37, 8 March 2016 edit undoRavensfire (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers89,316 edits Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Executive Order 11110. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| ] Please stop your ]. If you continue to ] Misplaced Pages, as you did at ], you may be ]. ''Misplaced Pages uses ] for information, not personal opinion or conspiracy websites. You are welcome to discuss this on the article talk page: ]. Please read the reliable source page first and make sure you have good sources that meet that criteria to back up your points.''<!-- Template:uw-vandalism3 --> <b><font color="darkred">]</font></b> <font color="black">(])</font> 23:34, 8 March 2016 (UTC) | ] Please stop your ]. If you continue to ] Misplaced Pages, as you did at ], you may be ]. ''Misplaced Pages uses ] for information, not personal opinion or conspiracy websites. You are welcome to discuss this on the article talk page: ]. Please read the reliable source page first and make sure you have good sources that meet that criteria to back up your points.''<!-- Template:uw-vandalism3 --> <b><font color="darkred">]</font></b> <font color="black">(])</font> 23:34, 8 March 2016 (UTC) | ||
| :''If this is a ], and you did not make the edits, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | |||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.{{Break}}''At this point, you have breached the 3RR limit. You must stop reverting and discuss on the article talk page. Continuing to revert will result in you being blocked and/or the page being protected from edits by new users and IP addresses.''<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> <b><font color="darkred">]</font></b> <font color="black">(])</font> 23:37, 8 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :''If this is a ], and you did not make the edits, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | :''If this is a ], and you did not make the edits, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | ||
Revision as of 23:37, 8 March 2016
March 2016
Hello, I'm Lazylaces. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Executive Order 11110— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Lazylaces (Talk to me) 23:25, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did at Executive Order 11110 with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Lazylaces (Talk to me) 23:26, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Misplaced Pages, as you did at Executive Order 11110, you may be blocked from editing. Misplaced Pages uses reliable sources for information, not personal opinion or conspiracy websites. You are welcome to discuss this on the article talk page: talk:Executive Order 11110. Please read the reliable source page first and make sure you have good sources that meet that criteria to back up your points. Ravensfire (talk) 23:34, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Your recent editing history at Executive Order 11110 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
At this point, you have breached the 3RR limit. You must stop reverting and discuss on the article talk page. Continuing to revert will result in you being blocked and/or the page being protected from edits by new users and IP addresses. Ravensfire (talk) 23:37, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.