| Revision as of 17:10, 10 March 2016 editScrapIronIV (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers33,329 edits Final warning: Using Misplaced Pages for advertising or promotion on Libby Schaaf. (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:29, 10 March 2016 edit undoScrapIronIV (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers33,329 edits Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Libby Schaaf. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
| ] You may be '''] without further warning''' the next time you ], as you did at ]. ]<!-- Template:uw-advert4 --> ''']<sup>]</sup>''' 17:10, 10 March 2016 (UTC) | ] You may be '''] without further warning''' the next time you ], as you did at ]. ]<!-- Template:uw-advert4 --> ''']<sup>]</sup>''' 17:10, 10 March 2016 (UTC) | ||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ''']<sup>]</sup>''' 17:29, 10 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:29, 10 March 2016
Welcome!
Hello, Mezzi10, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Libby Schaaf has not conformed to Misplaced Pages's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Misplaced Pages articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Misplaced Pages also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.
If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- Contributing to Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Dialectric (talk) 19:36, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Recent edit to Libby Schaaf
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Libby Schaaf, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 20:20, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Libby Schaaf, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Misplaced Pages:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.Dialectric (talk) 02:53, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Please do not add content to Misplaced Pages that may be copied from promotional or copyrighted sources and is not written in a neutral, encyclopedic style. Misplaced Pages is based on reliable, verifiable, neutral (third-party) sources, which must be cited if an entry is challenged or is likely to be challenged. See Misplaced Pages:Identifying reliable sources, Misplaced Pages:Verifiability, Misplaced Pages:No original research and Misplaced Pages:Neutral point of view. Please also note that Misplaced Pages is an encyclopedia, not a blog or a forum. As such, among other things, it is written in the third person. The inclusion of "we" in the edit certainly does not represent Misplaced Pages and is further indication that the material is promotional and was copied from another source rather than written in an encyclopedic style and sourced. See Misplaced Pages:What Misplaced Pages is not. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 02:56, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
February 2016
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Misplaced Pages, as you did to Libby Schaaf with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Donner60 (talk) 02:56, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Misplaced Pages, as you did at Libby Schaaf. Emotionalllama (talk) 03:02, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages and copyright
Hello Mezzi10, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. All or some of your addition(s) to Libby Schaaf has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Misplaced Pages, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.
- You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
- Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Misplaced Pages:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
- Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Misplaced Pages:Copyrights. You may also want to review Misplaced Pages:Copy-paste.
- If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Misplaced Pages:Donating copyrighted materials.
- In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Misplaced Pages:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
- Also note that Misplaced Pages articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Misplaced Pages project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Misplaced Pages:Copying within Misplaced Pages.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. The material you are trying to add is copied wholesale from http://libbyformayor.com/about.html Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 03:14, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
February 2016
Your recent editing history at Libby Schaaf shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Nat Gertler (talk) 03:45, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Mezzi10, you are invited to the Teahouse!
|
Hi Mezzi10! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 20:30, 24 February 2016 (UTC) |
February 2016
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mkdw 23:06, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
March 2016
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Misplaced Pages, as you did at Libby Schaaf, you may be blocked from editing. Scr★pIron 19:32, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Misplaced Pages for soapboxing, promotion or advertising, as you did at Libby Schaaf. Scr★pIron 17:10, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Libby Schaaf shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Scr★pIron 17:29, 10 March 2016 (UTC)