| Revision as of 02:41, 11 March 2016 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,301,879 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Malik Shabazz/Archive 58) (bot← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:41, 12 March 2016 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,301,879 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Malik Shabazz/Archive 58) (botNext edit → | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
| |editbox=no | |editbox=no | ||
| }}__FORCETOC__ | }}__FORCETOC__ | ||
| == I'd appreciate a comment, if you don't mind == | |||
| https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests#Bernie_Sanders_Topic_Ban_Appeal_from_Sir_Joseph | |||
| ] <sup><font color="Green">]</font></sup> 18:43, 29 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :Hi ]. I'll comment at ], which is on my watchlist. | |||
| :For future reference, please familiarize yourself with ], which you may have violated by posting a message here. — ] <sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub> 04:45, 1 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks, I thought since you're not an admin so it's not a vote it wouldn't matter, but I guess with Wiki everything is a problem. And now some admin is proposing a six month ban for me I guess because I dared appeal the initial ban, I think. Although I'm not sure why. ] <sup><font color="Green">]</font></sup> 18:00, 1 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :::BTW, is Encyclopedia Britannica a ]? The free version is available online and they have some nice articles online for all to use. ] <sup><font color="Green">]</font></sup> 18:32, 2 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :::::Yes, ''Britannica'' is a reliable source. Encyclopedias are ]s and while ]s are preferred, tertiary sources are fine. You should read ], a section of ], which discusses the appropriate use on Misplaced Pages of tertiary sources. — ] <sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub> 02:39, 3 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::I wonder if it's reliable enough for certain editors on certain pages though. I can't mention anything more for violating bans but.... ] <sup><font color="Green">]</font></sup> 03:59, 3 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::Understood. The less said about it at this point, the better. {{=)}} — ] <sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub> 04:07, 3 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :::: Strange, I wonder why a request for ''enforcement'' it listed on the requests for arbitration? Completely different area, I believe. --] (]) 18:55, 2 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :::::It's at ]. I don't know what happened to the link posted by Sir Joseph above. — ] <sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub> 02:39, 3 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::Sorry, I messed up the link. And it's an interesting read, although I removed lots of my defense, apparently I'm limited to 500 words but everyone else can post, and of course since I filed an appeal that means I get a six month extension to my one week block. I'm not sure why, but that is what it looks like. (and I got a stalker, I guess I made it in life.) ] <sup><font color="Green">]</font></sup> 04:17, 3 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| {{od}}] apparently every religion has interesting sub sections. It's very interesting what you can read on Misplaced Pages and that is why I like to read and edit Misplaced Pages. ] <sup><font color="Green">]</font></sup> 14:42, 4 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :I guess it is Soviet Russia. Except here we have timestamps to show admins lying through their teeth. ] <sup><font color="Green">]</font></sup> 15:47, 6 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == ] on ]. == | |||
| https://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:4chan#Alt-right ] (]) 03:27, 6 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Islamic Terrorist Attacks == | == Islamic Terrorist Attacks == | ||
Revision as of 02:41, 12 March 2016
SEMI-RETIRED This user is no longer very active on Misplaced Pages. |
|
| This is Malik Shabazz's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 5 days  |
|
Search the Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
Islamic Terrorist Attacks
Regarding the attack in Yemen in which 15 Elderly Christians were killed, I do not think it is appropriate to take down the post and say that it is not an Islamic attack. The local authorities stated that there is a high possibility that ISIL is responsible for the attack. Just because you think that information should be censored because it involves attacks that have been committed by Muslims that doesn't mean that you can take them down. You're username is Malcolm X so I am sure that you have a biased opinion regarding Muslims.
JasperHansen111 (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Karl X Saviour (talk • contribs) 08:09, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
- It really doesn't matter what you or I think. What matters is what reliable sources say. According to the source you selected and cited, the motive for the attack is unknown and no group has claimed responsibility for it. If local authorities have identified the perpetrators, please cite a source that says so.
- Also, please read WP:No personal attacks. As the policy says, "Comment on content, not on the contributor." Thank you. — MShabazz /Stalk 12:38, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
The Signpost: 02 March 2016
- News and notes: Tretikov resigns, WMF in transition
- Featured content: This week's featured content
- Traffic report: Brawling
- Recent research: Misplaced Pages and paid labour; Swedish gender gap; how verifiable is "verifiable"?