Misplaced Pages

User talk:Malik Shabazz: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:55, 12 March 2016 edit96.59.84.189 (talk) You Do Not Have A Neutral Pont of View: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 19:56, 12 March 2016 edit undoSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,555,904 editsm Signing comment by 96.59.84.189 - "You Do Not Have A Neutral Pont of View: new section"Next edit →
Line 40: Line 40:
== You Do Not Have A Neutral Pont of View == == You Do Not Have A Neutral Pont of View ==


You have improperly removed all citations at the Andrew Johnson Impeachment page for Robert Self Henry's "The Story of Reconstruction" even though the citations refer to matter of *fact,* not opinion. You have improperly removed all citations at the Andrew Johnson Impeachment page for Robert Self Henry's "The Story of Reconstruction" even though the citations refer to matter of *fact,* not opinion. <small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 19:55, 12 March 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Revision as of 19:56, 12 March 2016

SEMI-RETIRED This user is no longer very active on Misplaced Pages.

User:Malik Shabazz/Tabs

User talk
  • If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it.
  • If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, so please add it to your watchlist.
  • Please click here to leave me a new message.
This is Malik Shabazz's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 5 days 

Search the Archives


This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present.

Islamic Terrorist Attacks

Regarding the attack in Yemen in which 15 Elderly Christians were killed, I do not think it is appropriate to take down the post and say that it is not an Islamic attack. The local authorities stated that there is a high possibility that ISIL is responsible for the attack. Just because you think that information should be censored because it involves attacks that have been committed by Muslims that doesn't mean that you can take them down. You're username is Malcolm X so I am sure that you have a biased opinion regarding Muslims.

JasperHansen111 (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Karl X Saviour (talkcontribs) 08:09, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

It really doesn't matter what you or I think. What matters is what reliable sources say. According to the source you selected and cited, the motive for the attack is unknown and no group has claimed responsibility for it. If local authorities have identified the perpetrators, please cite a source that says so.
Also, please read WP:No personal attacks. As the policy says, "Comment on content, not on the contributor." Thank you. — MShabazz /Stalk 12:38, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 02 March 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

You Do Not Have A Neutral Pont of View

You have improperly removed all citations at the Andrew Johnson Impeachment page for Robert Self Henry's "The Story of Reconstruction" even though the citations refer to matter of *fact,* not opinion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.59.84.189 (talk) 19:55, 12 March 2016 (UTC)