| Revision as of 19:56, 12 March 2016 editSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,555,904 editsm Signing comment by 96.59.84.189 - "→You Do Not Have A Neutral Pont of View: new section"← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:02, 12 March 2016 edit undoMShabazz (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers8,606 edits →You Do Not Have A Neutral Pont of View: replyNext edit → | ||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
| You have improperly removed all citations at the Andrew Johnson Impeachment page for Robert Self Henry's "The Story of Reconstruction" even though the citations refer to matter of *fact,* not opinion. <small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 19:55, 12 March 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | You have improperly removed all citations at the Andrew Johnson Impeachment page for Robert Self Henry's "The Story of Reconstruction" even though the citations refer to matter of *fact,* not opinion. <small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 19:55, 12 March 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | ||
| :As I wrote in my edit summary, modern historians generally disregard the "facts" in Henry's 1938 book about Reconstruction because of his glaring white supremacist and neo-Confederate bias. Feel free to believe its "facts" if you'd like, but don't use that book as a ] -- because it's not. — ] <sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub> 22:02, 12 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:02, 12 March 2016
SEMI-RETIRED This user is no longer very active on Misplaced Pages. |
|
| This is Malik Shabazz's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 5 days  |
|
Search the Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
Islamic Terrorist Attacks
Regarding the attack in Yemen in which 15 Elderly Christians were killed, I do not think it is appropriate to take down the post and say that it is not an Islamic attack. The local authorities stated that there is a high possibility that ISIL is responsible for the attack. Just because you think that information should be censored because it involves attacks that have been committed by Muslims that doesn't mean that you can take them down. You're username is Malcolm X so I am sure that you have a biased opinion regarding Muslims.
JasperHansen111 (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Karl X Saviour (talk • contribs) 08:09, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
- It really doesn't matter what you or I think. What matters is what reliable sources say. According to the source you selected and cited, the motive for the attack is unknown and no group has claimed responsibility for it. If local authorities have identified the perpetrators, please cite a source that says so.
- Also, please read WP:No personal attacks. As the policy says, "Comment on content, not on the contributor." Thank you. — MShabazz /Stalk 12:38, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
The Signpost: 02 March 2016
- News and notes: Tretikov resigns, WMF in transition
- Featured content: This week's featured content
- Traffic report: Brawling
- Recent research: Misplaced Pages and paid labour; Swedish gender gap; how verifiable is "verifiable"?
You Do Not Have A Neutral Pont of View
You have improperly removed all citations at the Andrew Johnson Impeachment page for Robert Self Henry's "The Story of Reconstruction" even though the citations refer to matter of *fact,* not opinion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.59.84.189 (talk) 19:55, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
- As I wrote in my edit summary, modern historians generally disregard the "facts" in Henry's 1938 book about Reconstruction because of his glaring white supremacist and neo-Confederate bias. Feel free to believe its "facts" if you'd like, but don't use that book as a reliable source -- because it's not. — MShabazz /Stalk 22:02, 12 March 2016 (UTC)